| There are 48 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
|
|
Under control. Hah. That may be the funniest thing you have EVER posted. Naive, but funny.
|
|
|
You mean to tell me that prior to this, they actually had limits that they adhered to? If you believe that, I have some really great investments I need you to commit to today!!! An opportunity like this will be gone before dinner! hurry! lol
|
|
|
+1 guido. blessings from the "priest"
|
|
|
Just rhetoric. How do we know how compliant they were before when we had the ability to inspect only a limited number of sites? They may be more open about their non-compliance now, but that doesn’t mean they were really much more or even any more compliant beforehand.
|
|
|
Dude - we know you don't like your president. Same as I shared with Sherkhan. But, please don't prove you have your head buried in the sand.
|
|
|
Past Iran nuclear deal framework.....now is scrapped.
|
|
|
Phoenix!
|
|
|
"Past Iran nuclear deal framework.....now is scrapped".
Again, they never fully complied. You know that. Well, everyone else does.
|
|
|
Now the cap is off and they can OPENLY enrich all they want........what are we going to do about it?
|
|
|
I hope they are more arrogantly open about their nuclear program. The more open they are, the more accessible shiny, nice, new military targets will be.
|
|
|
They always were. Well 75% able. You really believe they ever stopped? All the previous shit did was make them hide it better.
|
|
|
Question: Does Israel have nukes and if so were did they get them???
|
|
|
They invented them themselves.
|
|
|
Don’t fuck with Ashkenzi Jews. They are smart.
|
|
|
Answer to your question:
You answer first.
|
|
|
*Ashkenazi. Apparently I’m the exception.
|
|
|
REALLY?
Where did their enriched Uranium come from and who is helping them maintain it?
|
|
|
Wouldn’t you like to know?
|
|
|
Perhaps we could just send another cargo plane with $1.7 Billion in Euro's and Swiss Francs on pallets.
|
|
|
To answer Dude. I don't know. And neither do you.
|
|
|
^That was their money going back from the Shah of Iran^
Do your research.
|
|
|
So why would it be ok for Isreal to secretly have nukes but not ok for Iran?
|
|
|
@DudeLebowski: Doesn’t mean you should to give it back to them if they are killing Americans and destroying American property. As to your other question about Israel (and why does it matter anyway), Google is your friend.
|
|
|
Um. Because Israel is an ally and not wishing death and destruction on any other country, and Iran is an enemy that has sworn the death and destruction of Americans and Israel. Duh!
|
|
|
Cause we are the biggest, baddest mother fuckers around and we make the rules.
Is that what you wanted to hear?
|
|
|
Why the money was sent to Iran. (Do your research dude)
"A stronger argument is that the U.S. had to make a big payment to Iran because of a 35-year-old deal for weapons that were never received. It wasn’t a matter of if, but when and how much. Washington was worried that the tribunal would impose a payment of several billion dollars, as Tehran demanded, and grabbed the opportunity to settle for the $1.7 billion as part of a overall pact at the same time Iran was benefiting from the nuclear agreement."
|
|
|
"A stronger argument" does not mean it is true or even probable.
As stated, you don't know. I don't know. Read Dude. That is not research. That is speculation.
|
|
|
@Night-Rider thats what some may think but Iran thinks it has a right to have those weapons because of the threat of war from other countries. To protect themselves. (Just like what North Korea says)
|
|
|
Dude that was a copy paste I don't have time to post all of the things connected.
You want it, look it up yourself.
|
|
|
I have not heard of any Iranian operatives or Presidents bombing our cities, imposing draconian sanctions , starting wars here or assassinating US government officials on our soil. But maybe I missed something.
|
|
|
Dude, try to YOUR'S & Our President out of your demented Dome for at least a day a week.
TDS running wild with you..
|
|
|
They don’t have the right to shit if they are threatening your existence.
|
|
|
@thedon60 LOL.... yeah two weeks after being impeached lol
|
|
|
Don't need it. Don't want it. It is all speculation. Guesses. What ifs.
As stated many times. You don't know. We don't know. I don't know.
You can try to convince yourself you know, but you don't.
|
|
|
@Night-Rider is Israel has Nukes and Iran does have them but is trying to get them how is Iran threatening Israel's existence? Seems like maybe the other way around.
|
|
|
Typo but you know what I mean
|
|
|
"I have not heard of any Iranian operatives or Presidents bombing our cities, imposing draconian sanctions , starting wars here or assassinating US government officials on our soil. But maybe I missed something."
Well then, familiarize yourself with a brief history of Iranian attacks on Americans. What you say hasn't happened could have easily have happened:
1. Hostages held at U.S. embassy in Iran
2. Suicide bombings in Lebanon, killing hundreds of American troops
3. Mine attack and harassment in the Persian Gulf
4. Truck bombing in Saudi Arabia
5. Deadly Iranian influence in Iraq, killing over 600 American soldiers there
6. Unjustly detaining Americans
7. Assassination attempt in D.C. -- American law enforcement disrupted a plot backed by Soleimani to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador to the U.S. by bombing a popular restaurant in Washington, D.C., which would have killed Americans on U.S. soil.
8. Attacks on U.S. interests in Africa
9. Hezbollah plots attacks in U.S. -- In June 2017, two Iranian-backed Hezbollah operatives were arrested for conducting surveillance of U.S. military and law enforcement facilities, as well as airports, in NYC in preparation for terrorist attacks against Americans, which would have included bombing our citizens on American soil.
10. Agents of Iran in the U.S.
11. Iranian proxies target U.S. diplomats -- Iranian-backed terrorist proxies in Iraq launched attacks against the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and the U.S. Consulate in Basra.
|
|
|
Iran's leaders have commented on numerous occasions throughout the years that one of their chief foreign policy objectives is to destroy the state of Israel. Israel has NEVER said the same thing about Iran. A nation like Iran that has such an irresponsible foreign policy objective should NEVER be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons. Period.
|
|
|
^ He said starting wars^
|
|
|
If you look at a map of our military bases in the Middle East one sees there are scores of them literally surrounding Iran. How quickly we forget that Iran is the sworn enemy of the Taliban, Al Queda, and the Islamic State! If was only months ago that we provided cover to the Iranian militias fighting the Islamic State in Iraq. I am not putting everything on Trump because he did not get us into these endless wars. Obama adopted the Targeted assassinations and drone warfare.
But It was Trump with withdrew
from a successful Treaty (internationally verified), increased crippling sanctions and now recklessly assassinated a leader of another nation on Iraqi soil. These maneuvers have escalated the danger of a real war. He bears that responsibility
|
|
|
If the Iranian-supported Hezbollah terrorist attack had been successful, bombing and killing many Americans on U.S. soil, that would have been an act of war.
|
|
|
No trial, no REMOVAL. Thats all that means. He's been impeached.
Im fine with what Nancy is doing after McConnell said he's going to run the trial in coordination with the White House. WTF?
|
|
|
he's not been formally impeached until pillosi delivers the articles to the senate, and you're correct, it will die there
|
|
|
^^^ the definition of impeachment
“ Impeachment in the United States is the process by which the lower house of a legislature brings charges against a civil officer of government for crimes alleged to have been committed, analogous to the bringing of an indictment by a grand jury. ... The impeached official remains in office until a trial is held.“
The president has been impeached by the House of Representatives.
I’m sure the senate will find him not guilty. The party majority always tows the party line regardless, of the party.
|
|
|
Just like impeachment, no political party will vote to censor one of their own.
|
|
|
Impeachment is essentially meaningless if done by one party. It is partisan, political, and ineffective in checking the power of the President.
|
|
|
No its meaning full. If the Republicans want to letting Trump off the hook for withholding Congress approved aid in order to get a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political rival and then obstruct justice let them do it. That not a good presence when the shoe turns on the other foot.
|
|
|
bam
|
| There are 48 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
