There are 15 comments on this blog. |
|
thank you for this one butthead
|
|
The very thing the Preppers warned us about for years. There day of reckoning is now. And you didn't believe.
|
|
Sorry BH. not pointing that at you personally. ^
|
|
Excellent article, Mr. BH.
|
|
Afm None taken
I'm a numbers person so that's what I can identify with
|
|
Nice article. I disagree on the isolation quarantine results as being depicted as a failure since social distancing is just as fallible. However it's a great way of explaining the general idea of both methods.
Thanks for taking the time to share!
|
|
I guess if you want to measure the fallibility of social distancing, just imagine a simulation where balls that stand still on occasion start moving for some time and then stop again. Not hard to realize that these balls therefore will more likely bounce into other ones, and the total number of "infected" balls would rise.
|
|
Yeah, great post -- simple and gets the point across. Another angle on this is how long a ball can travel before it knows it is sick and its behavior after it knows (the sick balls in this simul travel even after they are sick, presumably after they KNOW they are sick).
So self-quarantine upon getting ill would also make things less severe than these simulations show; sick people don't break other people's quarantines either.
|
|
My wife has been giving my toilet paper to her relatives. I guess it's community property. I'm going to hide a couple of dozen roles in the attack and if we run out I'm not sharing.
Several years ago I stocked up on toilet paper and she thought I was out of my mind. I have no idea why I bought extra toilet paper.
|
|
You would let your wife walk around with a soiled ass crack?
You are so not getting laid
|
|
|
|
Look at this WTPOS once again using the argument that unless they can do whatever the fuck the want, it's "unconstitutional".
MAGA.
|
|
Neat link
|
|
Correct link.
|
|
Still a good link
|
There are 15 comments on this blog. |