There are 17 comments on this blog. |
|
To: KS
Did you read the article I cited? And you still think she is not biased?
|
|
My point is that her ability to judge at supreme court may be influenced by her religious belief, and there is nothing wrong with my opinion.
|
|
So... you are saying she wouldn’t love her children... and that opinion is based on a cursory reading of a few things she wrote about policy?
“There is nothing wrong with my opinion”
Opinions are like armpits... everyone has a couple ... and some of them stink. You sir, have a stinky... uninformed opinion.
|
|
To KS
You are obviously biased to the right/Trump agenda as always as I already proved it in another blog, and I don't think you read the article I cited. That is your usual mindset.
"Barrett barred admission to those parents and made it plain that openly G...L weren't welcome in the classroom"
I edited the above largely so that it does not interfere with TOS
|
|
ACB potentially being confirmed as Trumps 3rd appointment on Monday, Hillary Clinton's birthday... is priceless.
|
|
^ LOL
Well the October campaign does say, “Real Men Wear Pink”
|
|
I’m sorry spongy if I offended you when I commented a couple of months ago on your “I’m a great dad” comment.
I see that bothered you enough that you have brought it up multiple times. I’ll try to be more sensitive in the future.
|
|
OK... 😉
|
|
You betcha.
|
|
USB, tl;dr
You guys should link the previous blogs so us lazy fucks dont have to search.
I didn't see rawdoggers link but would be interested to know if ABC is intolerant of faggots and dikes.
Personally, I don't have a problem with someone's religion informing their decisions depending on what they are. Especially, if they're Buddhists. Catholics, Jews, Hindus, Progressives and Muslims are all a rung down from there.
However, being a libertarian means I'm intolerant of intolerance.
|
|
Whatever label you like to attach is up to you but we're considerably more tolerant than Progressives.
We arrive here from all parts of the political spectrum after observing the self serving hypocrisy of the 2 major parties.
In the end, you're both losing people as the independent category grows every year.
|
|
I'd forgotten how important your opinion is, so thanks for sharing.
As the independent category grows, you might find some changes to the political arena.
And, third party candidates have made a difference in more than one cycle although not any libertarians.
Basically, I vote independent of party and judge each on their own merits.
Your simplistic views won't change that.
But, good luck.
|
|
Your welcome but that would be a lie.
You actually do care who I vote for and how everyone else votes.
You're not in this just for the lively discussion.
That would imply you have no skin in the game
But, you spend too much time and argue too vehemently for us to believe you don't care.
And, it's OK to do so
Its important stuff
|
|
* you're
|
|
"Personally, I don't have a problem with someone's religion informing their decisions depending on what they are. Especially, if they're Buddhists. Catholics, Jews, Hindus, Progressives and Muslims are all a rung down from there.
However, being a libertarian means I'm intolerant of intolerance"
I have to make an note that my longer message was deleted. So probably you didn't get my points.
I don't mind at all who has such and such religion. I only have a problem with Christian Fundamentalism movement in the US, which uses Bible for political purposes, and presenting god for more of a judgement and punishment than as a god of love and mercy.
|
|
Trump is basically a libertarian and Roger Stone is self-claimed libertarian. So is Jerry Falwell Jr as well by looking at his conduct.
Hunger and lust for power has no limit.
|
|
Philosophically speaking, Libertarianism means;
All libertarians begin with a conception of personal autonomy from which they argue in favor of civil liberties and a reduction or elimination of the state.
Personal autonomy =death of god
|
There are 17 comments on this blog. |