| There are 20 comments on this blog. |
|
|
Bob is desperate for that white approval. He's throwing it in a circle for white zaddy πππ€£ππ€£π€‘π€‘π€‘π€‘
|
|
|
Bobs gonna have a meltdown when trump flips GA and AZ then the SC invalidates PAs votes
Hope you didnt pack your riot gear. Youll probably still need it
|
|
|
^^^dont forget MI and WI
|
|
|
The Republican Atty. Gen. of Arizona, an ardent Trump supporter, just said:
-Biden will win AZ
-No fraud
I guess that pushes Biden up to 270. Of course, they should have listed to the Fox Decision Desk guy last Tuesday nite who called AZ for Biden.
|
|
|
Crank Op is stating that the Supreme Court justices won't take those weak lawsuits on their merit, or lack of, but rule politically, or to pay back Trump.
|
|
|
none of this fucking shit matters. Just like the Blm Movement. Let's see how it plays out.
|
|
|
^^^the coonery is sickening
|
|
|
Bob is a butter biscuit with jam on top π¦π€£π€£ππ
|
|
|
This USB right now
|
|
|
Will one of you leftist gay bois be able to debunk Dr. SHIVA?
|
|
|
As I mentioned in another blog, in CA, once they open the mail in envelope, there is no
way to trace your ballot to your signed envelope. Anyone who understands auditing
would know that you need to have some way to trace your ballot to your signed envelope,
like signing each page of your ballot.
Since this was not done in CA, I believe this was done by design.
This is a weakness is handling mail in ballots in CA
I won't be surprised if CA continues to allow mail in ballots in future elections.
Marco Rubio, the FL senator, also mentioned this problem occurring in other states.
Only people who request ballots should be allowed to mail them
|
|
|
Hey Dr Boogie,
I'm not so sure about this.
Because my ballot looked just like every one I've had here in CA since the first time I voted.
That was when I was 18.
You've said it before, but that doesn't make it true.
What's your source, I'd like to look into that.
|
|
|
USA TODAY
Tens of thousands left the president option blank, though 'undervotes' were down from 2016
Josh Salman, Matt Wynn and Dinah Voyles Pulver, USA TODAY
|
|
|
P90
I'm not sure what makes Dr Shiva a quality source, is it because he went to MIT?
I thought eggheads were not to be trusted?
Or is it because he is not to be trusted...
because he thinks the world is organized around some complex and vast conspiracy, like the conspiracy that debunked Shiva's claims about inventing email. (which btw he didn't)
Conspiracies don't happen.
It's too fucking chaotic out there and people can't keep their traps shut.
Look at all the crooks who flipped on each other over the last 4 years.
Bannon is probably flipping right now on that Veteran (respect 9since it's veterans day) who stole money from donors to the "build the wall" foundation.
Respect to both of those dudes.
|
|
|
they present some intriguing data
it is hard to know who can you trust these days
|
|
|
All I really want for Xmas is for USB to use indents and new paragraphs.
There might be something interesting in that post but no way am I reading it, lol
C'mon, man!
|
|
|
Back on topic, agree with OP.
Both WSJ and NYT consider it a fair aggregator
On the sub-topic, let the process work, eventually our Johnny Ringo will ride off into the sunset
And, I don't think he'll be back in 2024
At least I hope not
The Repubs have to do better next time
Joe will be toast, so it'll be interesting to see who the Dems field
|
|
|
Really, you got fans?
Got any groupies that you can bone?
|
|
|
T
M
I
|
|
|
βmy peak yearsβ
|
| There are 20 comments on this blog. |
