| There are 43 comments on this blog. |
|
|
Doesn't mean fraud occurred.
|
|
|
QUEEN COVID, They are going to audit the absentee ballots.
They will be able to sort out that part of any voter fraud pretty easily.
|
|
|
A senate subcommittee's request is nice grandstanding, but it has no legal standing.
|
|
|
it was a motion not a request.
|
|
|
The motion would kick it up to the full senate.
|
|
|
The states handle their own state election policies.
|
|
|
Full state senate.
|
|
|
You only need to audit a random sample and then compute a confidence interval in the Presidential results.
Anyway, they just did an audit of 15,000 random absentee ballots in Cobb county. Found all legitimately cast. Did a hand recount and a machine recount. And found a 99% confidence interval in the Presidential election results that confirmed them for this county.
Do the same thing in that other county. Bet you find the same result.
|
|
|
If this was a legit signature match process, they wouldn't have been afraid of having independent monitors present, would they?
|
|
|
Illegal Georgia Consent Decree got Rid of Signature Match between signature on file 4 registered voter & on mailed in ballot! They changed it to Signature on Request for Mail-in Ballots matched 2 that on ballot ! CREATED FRAUD! 6.4% Thrown out in 2016. 0.2% on Nov 3! STOP FRAUD!
In Fulton County they adjudicated 94% of ballots. Need independent audit!
|
|
|
It was a legit signature match process. They used the independent Georgia Bureau of Investigation to conduct the audit. It was confirmed by the Republican Secretary of State who is a Trump supporter.
|
|
|
If election officials are suspected of fraud, it's absurd for those same officials to be chosen for an "audit". It's a farce. And it smells of a giant attempted cover-up. It’s not an “audit” when the same people redo their work. Police don’t allow criminals to investigate themselves.
|
|
|
There is no evidence to suspect these people who are Trump supporters with fraud.
|
|
|
There is plenty of evidence of election fraud in plain sight. With the consent decree alone the FA election is unconstitutional and should be declared invalid
|
|
|
GA not FA
|
|
|
Georgia fraud. And 94% of ballots were adjudicated. Definite fraud there
|
|
|
PA970
Why won't any court look into this action? It seems that many have rejected this,even Trump appointees.
|
|
|
The courts have not based off technicalities like standing. They haven't ruled on the merits. The courts are scared to death of doing their job and they're not needed now. The state legislatures have the power to decertify the electors of PA, GA, WI, AZ and they are just 1 or 2 holdouts away from doing so
|
|
|
remember in 04 when dems voted against certifying the ohio electors based on fraud accusations?
god bless you John Lewis
|
|
|
I would think trump has done enough to convince people that he is a massive failure, and not qualified to lead anything that is for the betterment of someone other than himself. And even that he fucks up. For the good of the country. He needs to be prosecuted and jailed!
Obviously if you still support him, you are among the 30% that are classified as sheep.
And you most likely would be a Hitler supporter is you were born in that era.
|
|
|
Don't worry. Because of the ambiguity of 12A, its passive voice phrasing, I posit the “President of the Senate” has the exclusive constitutional authority to determine which “certificates” to “open” and thus which electoral votes “to be counted” in the event competing slates arrive. Pence will deliver a 2nd Trump term.
|
|
|
If the dems did send in fraudulent ballots, why didn't the GA senate seats flip in November? Why didn't the dems pick up a mess of congressional seats?
Because the ballots were sent in by RINOS and independents, who are sick or Trump.
|
|
|
Many ballots only had the presidential race filled. Nothing else. Plenty of evidence of election fraud in plain sight. Trump was just chosen the most admired man of 2020, gets much bigger crowds at rallies and like 100 time more view online than biden. On top of that he received 12 million more votes in his reelection bid while Obama received 4 million fewer votes in his reelection bid. Trump is the most popular politician in history. Biden is fraudulent and a carcass. Dont forget those 1 way vote dumps at 2am in the swing states
|
|
|
What you show is not evidence of fraud. The mail in ballots were to be counted after the same day election ballots. And they were counted in big batches. That explains the pattern in the data you showed, not fraud.
|
|
|
"Don't worry. Because of the ambiguity of 12A, its passive voice phrasing, I posit the “President of the Senate” has the exclusive constitutional authority to determine which “certificates” to “open” and thus which electoral votes “to be counted” in the event competing slates arrive. Pence will deliver a 2nd Trump term."
Pence is not going to do that. Just watch.
|
|
|
Definitely fraud. The GA election was unconstitutional and should be declared invalid. Likewise for PA and WI. PENCE will definitely do that. Why? Because he can
|
|
|
100 dollar bet he won't.
|
|
|
GA Senate Judiciary Committee votes *unanimously* to 1) audit Fulton and 2) DECERT Biden Electors; the vote included Ds on the committee
-Now, the GA SL needs 2 still vote on it.
-Regardless, their vote signals 2 the VP he may reject Biden EVs
AZ State Legislature Republicans circulating a petition (for Vice President Pence) to consider the Biden electors decertified, per Article 2.
-The argument is the "manner" in which a SL can appoint EVs is not specified, so a petition signed by a majority of the SL should be sufficient.
|
|
|
Tune in January 6th. Only good things will happen
|
|
|
It will all be over soon. Thank God.
|
|
|
SCOTUS has no role come January 6th. VP Pence solely decides which electors to count. Seven states are disputed. Those states electors will be thrown out and Trump wins reelection in a contingent election
|
|
|
Pence is well within his power under the ECA (and the Constitution) to present no votes for counting in the contested states. There is no conflict. The constitutional power of the VP to count the votes is found in the 12th Amendment which states, “the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted…” The votes shall then be counted" by whom? Well, the only person doing anything in that sentence is the President of the Senate. He does the meaningful counting according to the 12th. And the ECA agrees! (See the rules of textualism, noscitur a sociis, &/or associated words) The ECA makes it even clearer that the VP does the counting and that includes not counting! Section 15 of the ECA lays out the procedure of opening the votes, counting, and reading them. It says, AFTER READING, the President of the Senate shall call for objections. Objections and votes in the Houses are messy and unpredictable. We'd prefer to not go that route. We'd need every Republican senator to vote in favor of an objection - ugh. What’s clean and easy, would be for Pence to present no votes. But can he? We can also avoid objections if Pence doesn't count contested votes. The ECA says BEFORE READING the VP will hand to the tellers as they are “OPENED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, all the certificates & papers purporting to be certificates...which certificates & papers shall be opened, presented, AND ACTED UPON…” “[A]nd acted upon” is an interesting phrase here. There is no mention of the legislature in this part of the section. Rather, every action performed in this part refers to the VP. Let’s really break it down from the beginning: Two tellers are appointed by the Senate and two by the House (“Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives. The VP does the opening and handing to the tellers (“And they will be handed AS THEY ARE OPENED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE”) Of all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes” (again I argue “all” and “papers purporting to be” are very important for other reasons...)
Now here’s an interesting part. The sentence goes on to say “...which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A…” So who “opens, presents, and acts upon”? The ECA just told us who opens. It says the VP. The statute does not say who presents and acts upon, but it lumps those actions in with an action it delegates to the VP. (rules of textualism, noscitur a sociis &/or associated words) This interpretation is consistent with the precedent set by Nixon in 1961 wherein he presented only one of three sets of votes. He "acted upon" the three sets he had, made a decision as to which, if any, was proper, and counted those votes.
|
|
|
Pence doesn’t have to play a card. In fact, he can put the cards in his pocket or throw them out the window. He doesn’t have to choose Trump’s electoral votes. He doesn’t have to choose Biden’s.
|
|
|
They are going to protest in both chambers, if they do accept the protest and go to a vote, the dems still control more votes in congress. So even if congress votes, it'll be for Biden. Check Mate.
No you are totally and completely incorrect. Do your research. The vote is by State, not individual congress person. So each states Congress people vote and the state gets ONE vote. Trump probably wins, since the majority of the states have a majority of Republicans.
|
|
|
In GA, there were at least 206,000 adjudicated ballots in Fulton & Gwinnett. When a ballot is adjudicated, a completely new ballot image is created, & no record is maintained of the previous ballot image. Manual recounts are verifying these new ballot images not original ballots. Fulton County's Elections Chief, Richard Barron, "We've scanned 113,130. We've adjudicated over 106,000. Ballots are adjudicated.. if there is some question.. the vote review panel then determines voter intent." In a later interview, "We scanned 137,134 ballots. We have adjudicated 132,272. Gwinnet County adjudicated as many as 80,000.
"In Gwinnett County, located northeast of Atlanta, as many as 80,000 absentee ballots were flagged for an “adjudication” process... said county spokesman Joe Sorenson."
On adjudicating 93.6%.
"This is not about Donald Trump or Joe Biden. This is about are we still a country where your vote matters? Because this is broadcasting to every person in GA, *Your Vote Does NOT Matter* because we decide what you meant"-@jovanhpulitzer
The adjudication process was *NOT* bipartisan. The vote review panel consisted of 1 Republican, 1 Democrat, & 2 League of Women Voters (LWV). The LWV supports progressive policies aligning with Democrats; climate change, gun control, universal healthcare, etc.
|
|
|
No matter how many times you audit or recount the same shit, it won't make stupid people smart.
|
|
|
Paper ballots are still the way to go, BTW.
Very important to have that audit trail. I agree with that.
But that is not a Dem thing or a GOP thing, that is a bipartisan thing.
|
|
|
GA fraud
|
|
|
So, there’s a bunch of boxes with ballots. What’s the context ? How many times have Trump supporters taken a picture or video and spin it out of context? This new Tweet reports breaking news of “someone” seeing these boxes of ballots in a Warehouse and people shredding them.
How stupid can this witness be if he could take pics of these “fraudulent boxes of ballots” in warehouse and alleged seeing workers shredding them, then why couldnt he have taken pics or video of people shredding the boxes or even call them cops if something nefarious was going on?
This new Tweet supposedly happened recently (ie a couple of days ago) but these pics look awfully close to the ones Lin Wood posted on Dec 13. Are these guys recycling conspiracy pics? All this time since Dec 13 had passed and still they can’t prove these ballots as fraudulent for being there?
|
|
|
We are suppose to believe Biden got 81 million votes when no one even gives a shit when he walks into a dinner?
|
|
|
^Person could be looking away for a few seconds. That's all the snapshot shows.
|
|
|
After a ballot is scanned and adjudicated, the original scan ceases to exist and only the adjudicated scan will exist.
If a recount just counts the adjudicated scans, then you will always come to the same fraudulent number.
Original votes only exist on the ORIGINAL HARD COPIES.
Irrefutable evidence from GA
|
|
|
Just another example of voter suppression!
|
| There are 43 comments on this blog. |
