| There are 41 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
|
|
A Golden Retriever on my street just told me that the twats at Life Site sold her bad dietary supplements that made her hair fall out and she want's to sue.
Does anyone know a good product liability lawyer?
I'm not sure I should believe a Golden Retriever, because they're suck-ups and will do anything you tell them to do. I think someone gave her false information and she's just spewing ithis nonsense to make friends.
If it was a cat, on the other hand, I'd be totally convinced, because they don't give a shit.
|
|
|
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
We rate LifeSiteNews far right biased for story selection that always favors evangelical Christianity and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and many failed fact checks
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Canada (16/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
|
|
|
no wonder you guys are all whacked out........
|
|
|
i guess this is when the name calling mob starts to attack. so ill sit and wait, but will they click the link? nah, that would mean they would have to work and really think.
|
|
|
John Henry was one of the greatest race horses of all time.
|
|
|
And John Henry raced on Lasix And was gelded. Any connection?
|
|
|
So what exactly do you all know about the Pfizer authorization and the media parade that followed?
Is it full authorization?
Is liability protection removed?
Is it any better than the Vioxx authorization?
|
|
|
@ Mad4boobs:
"Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis."
Oh, you mean like CBS & Dan Rather.
Or:
Like the New York Times & Jayson Blair.
|
|
|
John Henry is a big fan of Iverrmectin.
John Henry the horse.
|
|
|
I was raised by a strawberry plant so trust me when I say I know stuff. Now don't get me wrong but the oak tree down the street was dropping leaves like mad today so that's tree speak for warning me that the feds are out to get us.
Don't say I didn't warn you when that vaccine starts turning people into vaccinated people--who look and act just like themselves. I know, I know call me crazy but it's the truth.
|
|
|
Dr. Malone, mRNA founding team member, says Pfizer Vax is still under emergency use ....
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DZQFYRGDkB6s/
|
|
|
Two things the MsM didn't tell you about the Pfizer Vax authorization
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
|
|
|
Since it takes the 'average' vaccine/drug 120 months to go from R & D to the approval stage, and many that get approved are still pulled after they go into use and the companies are sued i.e. see zantac & Oxycontin.
So there are valid questions that should/need to be answered:
1) Are phizer and moderna going to continue the testing and trials that they skipped in the 3 - 6 months of development? Those tests & trials that other drugs have to go through.
2) What are the test & trials they are going to do? Are they going to be the 'gold standard' test and trials that the fda, nih etc. are demanding of Ivermectin, Hydroxychlopquin or regeneron etc. to go through - all of which have shown to be highly effective against covid.
3) If not WHY not?
4) Are they going to release all the data or are they just going to cherry pick the data like they're currently doing and continue to censor any doctor/researcher/peer reviewed paper who has contrary findings.
5) Are they actually going to start tracking how people that are vaxed respond when they contract, or re-contract, the virus.
6) Are they going to start tracking who dies from the vax.
7) Are they going to start allowing autopsies on those that died from covid.
Just a few I'd like answered.
Atticus Finch
|
|
|
@dixklover
Do you realize Robert F Kennedy Junior runs the children’s defense fund? Before the CV vaccines were introduced they were known as experts on the subject.
Pull your fucking head out of your ass and start looking at information instead of trying to discredit messengers and platforms because you are ideologically opposed? You truly demonstrate you’re part of groupthink and the low IQ hivemind.
|
|
|
Does this count Dickmouf?
https://twitter.com/EpochTimesChina/status/1430550536789630983
|
|
|
blacks, homos, libs, righties....all the same shit
|
|
|
Oh snap!
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1
CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.
If I were the suspicious type, I would suspect the FDA was very aware of this study and what they were finding prior to their approval charade with Pfizer.
|
|
|
Atticus_Finch - Just one example of why your "average vaccine/drug 120 months to go from R & D to the approval stage" is false!
Every year a new flu vaccine is is developed. For example the 2021 flu shot was researched, developed, went through all 3 stages of clinical trials and was approved for use by the FDA .This was done in less than 12 months.
This process of a new flu vaccine is done each and every year in less than 12 months.
|
|
|
^You’re not going to convince him. He’s convinced himself that he already knows the answers to his “questions.”
|
|
|
@flash911. It’s an interesting study that makes possible sense mechanistically from a paper that shows that neutralizing antibodies tend to attain more potency and breadth in recovered people than they do in those vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine (although mRNA vaccines can produce a ton of these antibodies), but it is a retrospective observational study, and while they do try to control for age and socioeconomic status, I’m not sure that they were able to control completely for other confounders such as geographical regions — areas hit hard last time around might not be getting hit hard now. For example, Delta seemed to ignore the ultra-orthodox region during most of the time under study. So exposure between groups may be uneven. Still, even with confounders, the results are interesting but need further corroboration by independent studies.
If the result is correct, it’s actually exciting in a way because it shows we have a lot to learn, and the knowledge can be used to make better second-generation vaccines.
|
|
|
^Excuse me. They did control for different regions. My bad. It wasn’t clear they did that until the last few paragraphs.
Still, I’d like to see this result repeated before I’m certain of it. Qualitatively I have no problem with it, but some of those odd ratios seem rather skewed. They did control for comorbidities as a binary choice but not by degree, and I’m still convinced a lot of those old geezers they vaccinated early on (protection of the most vulnerable) were as a group a lot sicker and therefore naturally more vulnerable than their similarly aged unvaccinated recovered counterparts.
|
|
|
Meanwhile, if you want to push Ivermectin, at least make it absolutely clear to people who want to try it to not use quantities reserved for horses and cows.
|
|
|
"If the result is correct, it’s actually exciting in a way because it shows we have a lot to learn, and the knowledge can be used to make better second-generation vaccines"
Wait, wut?
The "science" isn't settled?
I thought once the woke declared it settled......
It was settled
No more discussion or questions
STFU and move along
Please don't tell Faucci about this
He'll just use this to flip-flop even faster
|
|
|
From John Hopkins:
A typical vaccine development timeline takes 5 to 10 years, and sometimes longer, to assess whether the vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials, complete the regulatory approval processes, and manufacture sufficient quantity of vaccine doses for widespread distribution.
1) Phase I clinical trials are the first step in assessing vaccines in people. Typically involving one to several dozen healthy volunteers, phase I trials assess short-term safety (e.g., soreness at the site of injection, fever, muscle aches) and immune responses, often with different vaccine dosages. Only if a vaccine candidate is shown to be safe in phase I trials will it move to larger phase II trials.
No time limit given.
2) Lasts 2-4 YEARS
Phase II clinical trials continue to assess safety and immune responses but in a larger number and more diverse group of volunteers, typically one to several hundred people. Phase II trials may include target populations of a specific age or sex, or those with underlying medical conditions. Vaccines for children start with adult volunteers and move to progressively younger groups of children. Different types of immune responses are often measured, including antibodies and cell-mediated immunity, but phase II trials do not assess how well a vaccine actually works. Only in phase III trials is vaccine efficacy assessed.
3) Lasts 2-4 years
Phase III clinical trials are critical to understanding whether vaccines are safe and effective. Phase III trials often include tens of thousands of volunteers. Participants are chosen at random to receive the vaccine or a placebo. In Phase III, participants and most of the study investigators do not know who has received the vaccine and who received the placebo. Participants are then followed to see how many in each group get the disease. Assessing short- and long-term safety is also a major goal of phase 3 trials.
4)Regulatory Approval Process
You guys really aren't that bright.).gif)
Atticus Finch
|
|
|
Even allowing for an accelerated development each phase would/should (?) take:
Phase 1: 2-3 months
Phase 2: 3-4 months
Phase 3: 6-9 months
Best case scenario - 11 months to development
Worst case scenario - 16 months to development
Phizer/moderna: somewhere between 3-6 months.
Keep blowing smoke guys you're doing fine.
Atticus Finch
|
|
|
I'll just leave this right here.
https://twitter.com/MaxTadpol/status/1430910487856705540
|
|
|
"Even allowing for an accelerated development each phase would/should (?) take:
Phase 1: 2-3 months
Phase 2: 3-4 months
Phase 3: 6-9 months
Best case scenario - 11 months to development
Worst case scenario - 16 months to development
Phizer/moderna: somewhere between 3-6 months."
@AtticusFinch
I think you are fixated on the timeline without looking at the results. The timeline is a guide but not the be all end all. I think you purposely use the timeline to confirm your biases without a careful examination of the data simply you want to believe, for some fucked up reason, that these vaccines aren't any good.
|
|
|
"without a careful examination of the data simply you want to believe, for some fucked up reason, that these vaccines aren't any good."
@NR please digest and reply to this.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.22.457114v1.full.pdf
Hint: "JAPAN suggests Delta variant is mutating in a way that may soon produce ADE to the Pfizer Vax thorough NTD mutations and boosters will only make the problem worse."
- Alex Berenson
|
|
|
Ugly Betty:
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(21)00662-0
|
|
|
"JAPAN suggests Delta variant is mutating in a way that may soon produce ADE to the Pfizer Vax thorough NTD mutations and boosters will only make the problem worse."
- Alex Berenson
There is a long way for the in vitro mechanisms discussed in the paper to translate to increased severity of infection. First of all, these are in vitro (test tube) experiments. Any graduate student in biology will know that what happens in a test tube often does not occur in living organisms (in vivo). So far, the enhancing antibodies discussed in the paper have not been shown to increase infectivity in vivo. They speculate that it could happen in vivo, but that's not showing it. Secondly, what's really important is not just showing antibody enhancement in vivo but showing that this antibody enhancement will lead to worse disease in immunized animals. The immune system is made up of much more than just antibodies, so the effect of this particular antibody enhancement may be relatively small and unimportant. Finally, Berenson and the authors make an assumption that Delta will evolve a certain way, which is not necessarily correct. Just because individual mutations are common, this doesn't guarantee that in combination they will become common or should become common naturally: We thought the Alpha variant, when it added the notorious E484K mutation that became common in Brazil and South Africa, was going to thrive because, by combining properties of the Alpha and Beta variants, it should have produced a highly transmissible and evasive virus, but that didn't happen, as that lineage died out.
So, before I get concerned about this, the researchers need to show in an immunized animal model that this enhancement leads to more severe disease using a well-known variant. However, I have taken notice of this issue.
Again, you're hearing hoofbeats and thinking zebras instead of horses. There is no evidence that this stuff is likely to happen. What has been shown to happen that is very concerning is a waning of vaccine efficacy for severe disease in Israel, and even this is not completely certain because of confounders in the data. I still want to see more evidence of this if it is true.
Having said all of this, it is inevitable that mutations in SARS-2 will lead to continuing decreased efficacy of current vaccines, so the vaccines must be updated with sequences representing the common variants at the time. We do this for the seasonal flu vaccine, based on what variants are around and what are likely to be around.
Finally, every think why Berenson NEVER has anything positive to say about the vaccines? The fact that he doesn't show a hint of balance is disturbing. It almost seems like he is rooting for these vaccines to fail. And someone who is rooting for that is an asshole, period.
|
|
|
was crane_op vaccinated?
|
|
|
2,3,6 months are the minimum estimates by Johns Hopkins of how long it would take phase 1, 2 & 3 to run in an accelerated trial. You know more then they do? Seriously?
So no, a best case 11 month accelerated trial estimate isn't just a 'guideline' BUT it is a best case scenario.
You're just assuming & hoping that everything goes/went perfectly in each step of every phase.
When does that EVER happen when doing something new? Answer - Almost NEVER.
You're also assuming that phizer, moderna, j&j are all telling the truth and not falsifying safety data, cherry picking the data, bribing researchers etc etc.
News flash - They do and they have and they've been caught doing it before and have paid BILLIONS in fines, and this vaccine means billions to their bottom lines.
Plus you want to dismiss all the doctors, researchers and scientists that have questioned them, including the former CEO OF PHIZER - Mike Yeadon.
Take it don't take it, I don't really care but don't sit there and try and tell everyone that they're safe, effective blah blah blah because you have no idea - NO ONE DOES.
But I do know that the fda, cdc, nih & niaih and big pharma have a revolving door for people going from one to the other and it shows in everything they're doing to promote all of these and because of that revolving door, the censorship of any dissenting opinions. All to protect big pharma.
Atticus Finch
|
|
|
You don't know the difference between they're, their, and there but you're a vaccine expert?
Are you also going to wow us with your grasp of the geopolitical landscape?
Do you really think your 7th grade education and familiarity of YouTube means you're as knowledge as scientists, doctors, and others who have spent decades in their respective fields?
|
|
|
who's the vaccine expert?
|
|
|
Not sure if he got the vaccine, but word around gaytown is that crane_op takes it deep and allows the full biological payload to be in his system.
|
|
|
Mad4Simps
|
|
|
^ so stfu with your gay realities
Fify
|
|
|
That’s right, Prolapse Circle is the preferred cum receptacle for the dirty gay boys.
|
|
|
ShitCan
|
|
|
Can we all just get along ??
|
|
|
Pleaaaaaaaase ???? 🥺🥺
|
| There are 41 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
