| There are 48 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
|
|
Remember when audits were treason and an attack on democracy?
Now it’s time to change positions because of the California recall.
|
|
|
Of course he will and he should!
|
|
|
Good! Stupid fucker thinks that’s a scare tactic LoL.
|
|
|
lol imagine telling people they will get their rights back if they elect Larry Elder and expect people to be pissed
Dems have truly lost it
|
|
|
ELECT LARRY ELDER and end this mask mandate SHIT
|
|
|
ELECT LARRY ELDER and end this mask mandate SHIT
|
|
|
Herschel Walker is challenging Democrats for GA senate seat, so guess what happened…
“Claims of stalking emerge as Herschel Walker preps for Georgia Senate run”
Link 1
Like clockwork, any black male that threatens Democrats has accusers coming out, what a sick group of people the left are
It’s funny cause Warnocks wife is actually on camera saying he’s an abusive POS but Dems don’t care
|
|
|
^In all fairness, that's just typical opposition behavior in politics.
|
|
|
Yeah...cause California should be a shit hole like tex-ass, louisiana, mississippi, alabama, georgia and fucking florida LOL.... Scary Larry's recall starts in.....3.....2......1....
Gotta love dumb fucks that think shit only flows in 1 direction
|
|
|
It's all a charade. The democrats will be cheating in an amount that will result in a landslide victory...
WARNING TO VOTERS: "Don't ever try this again."
|
|
|
@ NightRider:
Ok, if accusing an official is just politics as normal and both sides do it, thus it's acceptable, then you won't mind doing me a favor.
Let's take a small easy one - list out the number of Democrat nominees to the Supreme Court where Republicans have tried to scuttle with baseless accusations.
I'll wait.
|
|
|
Y'all have lost it.
Larry Elder is a lunatic.
Masks aren't an infringement of your right, you flippin' crybabies.
Neither are vaccine requirements.
Newsome is gonna win in a landslide and it won't even be close.
You weirdos live in fantasy land.
|
|
|
Gavin New-Scum: If you vote for Elder, he'll end mask mandates!
Voters with an IQ above plant life: That's one reason why we're voting for him!
Go back to Poop City, Gav boy. Have some chocolate ice cream with the Whore of Babylon-by-the-Bay.
|
|
|
tRumpanzees could have done something novel... like finding someone who ACTUALLY sucks less than Newsom. It shouldn't be that fucking hard considering what a piece of shit Newsom is.
But apparently it is
Apparently it's one of the MANY life skills tRumpanzees lack.
Gotta admit though, I'm still in awe of your "WISE" political strategy of pissing off, disenfranchising, and ostracizing EVERYONE who isn't a mainlining koolaid, roid raging lunatic, zealot cult sycophant. I mean not making even the SLIGHTEST attempt to reach out, ingratiate, or appeal in ANY way to that whopping 40% of the electorate that is independent and doesn't buy this party politics bullshit...who by the way outnumber your approximately 30%... Is sure an interesting choice. I'm impressed with your ability to run campaigns solely on pure unhinged hatred and distorted information.
|
|
|
OH...and I'm TOTALLY trying to score some ivermectin. THAT shit is golden.
What do you think I can get...maybe a 500-1000% mark-up?
Oh the irony of those who call everyone else sheep....self medicating with livestock dewormer
It's like a dream come true.
It's as good as when you all said tRump was going to be reinstated on national Koolaid day.
PURE GOLD.
|
|
|
They are just telling the people of California what they want to hear. I voted to recall because of his complete mishandling of the covid pandemic. Has nothing to do with his party affiliation.
|
|
|
Mishandled?
Our infection rates per capita are lower than almost all the red states....which at the moment are a shit show. It's been uncomfortable bur CA has handled this better than pretty much everywhere else.
But Newsom STILL sucks
|
|
|
Only Cuomo did a better job.
|
|
|
News on sucks, but he is following the right protocols to keep people safe.
|
|
|
I think the only chance against Newsom is if his supporters remain lackadaisical about voting while people who are for the recall remain energized.
|
|
|
"Ok, if accusing an official is just politics as normal and both sides do it, thus it's acceptable, then you won't mind doing me a favor.
Let's take a small easy one - list out the number of Democrat nominees to the Supreme Court where Republicans have tried to scuttle with baseless accusations.
I'll wait."
That's a stupid example. Republican administrations have had 11 people sent to the Supreme Court since nominations became heated in the '80s. Democrats have had only 4.
There simply wasn't the opportunity.
|
|
|
*same opportunity
|
|
|
Ok
biden can put Cuomo on the bench. He was or is a lawyer
|
|
|
I am going to interject a little reality into this conversation:
First, the latest polls show Newsom with a comfortable lead.
> Just 39% plan to vote "yes" on the recall. It needs to be at least 50% to remove Newsom.
Second, you really want to end the mask mandates? This is the latest headline from Florida:
> 15 Miami-Dade educators die from COVID-19 in 10 days
Third, wear a mask and get vaccinated. Most of you do not understand statistics and are minimizing how dangerous Covid is. The elderly and immunocompromised are not the only ones dying.
> Texas anti-mask Freedom Defender dies of COVID at age 30
|
|
|
You know they are concerned when the Unions have hired Bolshevik Bernie Sanders to pitch their Anti Recall agenda... How and why does that Communist have a position in government?
|
|
|
Also, the Texas anti-abortion law is going to motivate Democrats to vote en masse in 2022.
The Supreme Court essentially gutting Roe v. Wade was a big mistake and is going to backfire on Republicans.
Interesting how you focus on Newsom when DeSantis is committing political suicide right now.
|
|
|
Perhaps because they live in commie cali and there is an election around the corner?
|
|
|
Butthead
True, but that doesn’t look like it’s going to materialize. We shall see.
What do you think about everything else I posted?
|
|
|
Tough call. I left cali because of people like Nuisance.
I have no idea what is going to become of the USA
No way in hell hair gel will get the boot. I hope that is inaccurate.
|
|
|
Pineapple is not an apple...
A seahorse is not a horse...
And factcheckers contain no facts.
They're just pretzel logic updates to keep the bullshit narrative patched together.
|
|
|
You’re right, PS. I totally agree that you’re too dumb and simpleminded to understand what most people write.
I’ll try to remember to keep my sentences short and real simple for you. Maybe have someone else read them to you a couple of times slowly.
Just trying to be helpful.
|
|
|
When people can’t address what’s posted that clearly runs counter to their bullshit, they just go for insults.
I’m done for the night.
|
|
|
I seldom throw in my 2 cents with anything political, but I'm gonna throw in a few things for some of you to think about here....
1. For the people on the right really hoping Gavin gets the boot, I'm warning you now not to get your hopes up. California Dems worked hard to push for mail-in ballots for this which means they're planning to pull the same b.s. that happened in numerous states where thousands upon thousands of ballots just appeared out of nowhere for Biden. And in case anyone plans on accusing me of a conspiracy theory there, lemme just say that in my home state of Michigan I had an old friend see first hand some of the crap Dems pulled to make sure Republican reps couldn't see the underhanded shenanigans that went down in that state. Voter Fraud is very... very ... very real. But most Dems just stick their head in the sand and refuse to admit it's happening.
2. For everyone still choosing to live in fear over covid and are just ignoring the more that 30million people that have had it and fully recovered from it, you really need to get over your mask dependence and not be freaking out over the idea that somehow the removal of masks will suddenly kill everyone in the state. Come of, folks. If a fart can get through denim jeans then microscopic virus particles can easily get through just about any mask you put on.
3. Gavin's ads are pushing fear-mongering to get you to think you need him. There's even an ad out that makes it a point to say "recalling Newsome will put a Trump Republican in office" Oh no! A TRUMP republican! Gotta make sure to put in that evil T-word because... you know... Orange man bad. And California Dems have been trained by their media overlords to hate anything attached to that. So even though most folks on the ballot have nothing to do with Trump at all and there are other Democrat replacement choices as well, the plan from Newsome's camp is to throw Trump's name in there to manipulate YOU. Don't be stupid, people. Do your research.
|
|
|
@stixie-how fukin dumb can you get lol. Why are you bringing up the vet versions of this drug when the thread has nothing to do with it?
Ivermectin is enlisted in the World Health Organization’s Model List of Essential Medicines. To get the full scope of information, you will have to utilize medical journals from other nations due to suppression in US.
Ivermectin treats a multitude of conditions, has antiviral effects, and also causes immunomodulation in the host. Studies have shown its effect on inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells, as well as regulating glucose and cholesterol in animals
But hey..let’s not go with..you know..actual evidence..
Ivermectin for Covid-19: Real Time Meta Analysis of 60 Studies:
Link 1
A Continuation of a Timeline of Ivermectin-Related Events in the COVID-19 Pandemic [June 30, 2021]
Link 2
"What’s Going On? India Sees Surge Of Deaths And Injuries Following COVID-19 Vaccine Roll-Out"
"After seeing relatively good success in handling the COVID crisis with an emphasis on early treatments such as Ivermectin, India is all of a sudden seeing a surge in cases and deaths being attributed to the COVID-19 virus."
Ivermectin and the odds of hospitalization due to COVID-19: evidence from a quasi-experimental analysis based on a public intervention in Mexico City (June 2021) - large data set shows 52%-76% reduction in hospitalizationsBut some are wondering if the ramping up of COVID “vaccines” is the cause behind these recent surges.
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/r93g4/
Lol @ “dewormer”..dude your posts are like a Democrat bot.
Fukin moron
|
|
|
And once again people, a mask has NO EFFECT ON VIRAL TRANSMISSION. The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.
|
|
|
I been TRYING to catch the Rona for 18 months now
No fucking luck
There's plenty of stupid to go round on both sides, though.
Mectin and HCL are both on WHO's list of essential drugs and have been used for years as prophylactics. If a doctor prescribes and the patient follows the dosage, then fuck off.
You idiots that post your bullshit on here are "science deniers", plain and simple.
On the other hand, if you swallow a whole bottle then you're an idiot and deserve to go blind.
5 well known media figures who've denied the Covid died of it, that's fucking stupid.
Some of you actually are OK with Newsome, even though he's on the take from Blue Shield and the unions, wasting money on the train,....fuck, the list is endless with this guy.
If you're incapable of forgetting the D or R behind their name
And, looking deeper
Then you're an idiot
This place is filled with them
All but the Stix-man
Cause being a Nihilist
Means "never having to say you're sorry"
|
|
|
^ So once again. "Can face masks help slow the spread of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that causes COVID-19? Yes. Face masks combined with other preventive measures, such as getting vaccinated, frequent hand-washing and physical distancing, can help slow the spread of the virus." The Mayo clinic, CDC and every other qualified authority on the subject say yes but you read something on Facebook and so no....SMH.
|
|
|
Umm..I don’t have Facebook
Let’s try this one more time..back in May of 2020 the CDC released the results of 14 individual studies conducted by various universities and medical institutions on the effectiveness of the mask in preventing the spread or preventing contracting the influenza virus, which is 220 nm's on average. The results were all the same. Neither did the mask slow down or prevent the spread of the virus nor did it prevent or slow down the infection rate of the virus. So if the masks do nothing for the influenza virus, why would you think it is effective against a much smaller one?
CDC Volume 26, Number 5—May 2020 Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures
““In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51–1.20; I2 = 30%, p = 0.25)”
”
Explain
Also, if masks were effective it would have shown to be the case last year..we can go by state or country.
Which would you like to go by first?
In my hometown, Santa Clara County has had a mask mandate for 9 months and over 5 months ago, implemented fines of up to $500 for individuals & $5000 for non-compliant businesses
So what happened? Deaths went up 5200% after they started the fines
If masks save lives, why do they not save lives..?
|
|
|
There's clearly a lot of contrary evidence around Ivermectin. Merck's position is "No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies" but there are other sources that have at least correlation with some positive effects. I'm keeping an open mind and agree " Clearly those who swallow a whole bottle or tube of horse dewormer we can do without.
|
|
|
Thats a easy one, dawg!
Cause Nick heard it on TeeVee!
Dat make it true, amirite?
|
|
|
@DavisM1 as stated above. "Face masks combined with other preventive measures, such as getting vaccinated, frequent hand-washing and physical distancing, can help slow the spread of the virus". There are many variables at play here and masks are a cheap and relatively easy part of a multifaceted approach to slowing the spread (flattening the curve) of a highly transmissible virus. Nobody is pretending they are the only part or 100% effective.
Nick
|
|
|
@NickSavg-Again, why do you people KEEP bringing up the VET version of this drug?
Ivermectin - Peer Reviewed Meta Analysis (23rd June) - Safe and Effective COVID treatment
Link 1
Ivermectin tablets to be distributed among Uttarakhand residents to prevent Covid, says state govt
Link 2
COVID Deaths Plunge After Mexico City Introduces Ivermectin"
Link 3
All you people can do is repeat..b..b..but “dewormer”
Do you understand the difference between the two?
|
|
|
@Nick-dude all you can do is copy & paste what you read from the MSM, you literally have no understanding of how masks work, take a basic physics class, I explained in detail about 2 weeks ago how you would have to be a fukin moron to think a mask has any effect on viral transmission.
AGAIN..The reason workers in a virus lab wear moon suits, go through multiple sets of sealed doors with decontamination procedures before that suit is removed and breathe pressurized outside air while inside the lab is that these are facts and said virus -- any virus -- will go right through any "mask."
|
|
|
Zimbabwe approves use of ivermectin
Link 1
Covid: Ivermectin to be studied as possible treatment in UK
Link 2
Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 – A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial”
Link 3
|
|
|
Effects of Ivermectin in Patients With COVID-19: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial”
Link 1
There has not been a proper placebo controlled study for vaccines in 37 years.
|
|
|
MASKS-
Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
Link 1
“The physical properties of medical and non-medical facemasks suggest that facemasks are ineffective to block viral particles due to their difference in scales [16], [17], [25]. According to the current knowledge, the virus SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nm to 140 nm [nanometers (billionth of a meter)] [16], [17], while medical and non-medical facemasks’ thread diameter ranges from 55 µm to 440 µm [micrometers (one millionth of a meter), which is more than 1000 times larger [25]. Due to the difference in sizes between SARS-CoV-2 diameter and facemasks thread diameter (the virus is 1000 times smaller), SARS-CoV-2 can easily pass through any facemask [25]. In addition, the efficiency filtration rate of facemasks is poor, ranging from 0.7% in non-surgical, cotton-gauze woven mask to 26% in cotton sweeter material [2]. With respect to surgical and N95 medical facemasks, the efficiency filtration rate falls to 15% and 58%, respectively when even small gap between the mask and the face exists [25].”
“A meta-analysis among health care workers found that compared to no masks, surgical mask and N95 respirators were not effective against transmission of viral infections or influenza-like illness based on six RCTs [28]. Using separate analysis of 23 observational studies, this meta-analysis found no protective effect of medical mask or N95 respirators against SARS virus [28].
|
|
|
Here sheeple..A very simple test proves that masks don't work. Put a mask on and blow on some eyeglasses through it. If it fogs up, that are aerosol particles condensing on the lens. VIOLA
Sorry you all were cucked..the entire time
|
|
|
“New findings reported Tuesday in a University of Louisville study challenge what has been the prevailing belief that mask mandates are necessary to slow the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus. The study notes that "80% of US states mandated masks during the COVID-19 pandemic" and while "mandates induced greater mask compliance, [they] did not predict lower growth rates when community spread was low (minima) or high (maxima)." Among other things, the study—conducted using data from the CDC covering multiple seasons—reports that "mask mandates and use are not associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 spread among US states."
|
| There are 48 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
