| There are 35 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
|
|
Spanner seems to be in full support of the anarchists creating havoc.
How dare anyone show up at a *RIOT* with the ability to defend themself.
Maybe someone can tell us what part of the Constitution allow people to freely burn, loot, and riot businesses and private property and those activities must "not be infringed "
The more criminals that get mowed down in those circumstances the better.
|
|
|
His content is based on emotion, not facts...
|
|
|
I'm sure spanner thinks Jesse is innocent too. ).gif)
|
|
|
"Just another crack pot with a gun looking to shoot someone."
Looks like he shot the right someones!
Congrats!
|
|
|
What's lost among all this nonsense by the Mensa candidates on HX is that according to Wisconsin law, Rittenhouse is innocent. Change the law if you don't like it. Everything else is a result of people incapable of coming to terms with the facts.
|
|
|
+1
|
|
|
Kyle bagged his limit for felons in Wisconsin -- the limit is three.
|
|
|
New riots, new limits... Just sayin...
|
|
|
They won’t succeed in changing the law. What he did was self defense in all 50 states.
|
|
|
My bad. In the city of Chicago, it’s mutual combat.
|
|
|
If there are more riots in the future, either the police will use more force, or
more citizens will be armed to defend their property.
How many here, would actually let someone attack you or destroy
your property and not fight back?
The radical left wants you to submit to their agenda through intimidation.
They are not interested in one's constitutional rights.
|
|
|
If my Loved ones or property were in danger from the mob,
I would protect mine and neighbors without a doubt.
|
|
|
"If my Loved ones or property were in danger from the mob,
I would protect mine and neighbors without a doubt."
Your statements don't apply to Rittenhouse.
|
|
|
@CandyMan-Rittenhouse did not break any Wisconsin gun laws
|
|
|
The left are in full panic mode with trumps scotus about to forever change the 2A and give us our rights back so now they want to criminalize self defense and make it racist
|
|
|
Issues with the Left on this verdict:
1. The prosecutor laid foundation that Kyle had 'intent' to kill and that's all they have to hang onto. This is wrong. The only intent Kyle had was to defend himself. Completely legal given the circumstances and the jury agreed. Liberal heads explode.
2. There is a theory called the 'Safari Principle' that has taken over the Left. Invented by Eric Holder, The Safari Principle (see Zimmerman trial) is a narrative engineering method that states, legal or not, 'he should not have ... '
Examples:
'Zimmerman should not have gotten out of his car when he saw Trevon casing houses, looking through windows.'
'Kyle should not have gone to Kenosha looking for trouble.'
Both cases not guilty but does rile the Liberal mindset. We see it here as well.
3. Libs see this as 'Open Season' on 'mostly peaceful protestors', Translated, Libs want p'ANTIFA, BLM and brick throwers to have free reign to destroy / burn property and attack others in the name of Social Justice. Having ANYONE get off when killing to defend themselves against their evil sets a bad precedent.
Personally, I get this. I don't agree, but I get it. I don't want to see more killing either, but I do stand up for the right of self defense.
4. Racism. When all other arguments fail, it's 'RACISM!' Pure unadulterated bullshit. This is the last gasp of a losing argument.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/11/20/watch-blm-calls-for-federal-murder-charges-against-rittenhouse/
5. Politics of Division.
Did you see what Que Mala said?
“The verdict really speaks for itself,” Harris told reporters. “As many of you know, I’ve spent a majority of my career working to make the criminal-justice system more equitable, and clearly, there’s a lot more work to do.” LOSER.
Or Jerry Nadler?
"This heartbreaking verdict is a miscarriage of justice and sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review by DOJ. Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected protest.” DIVIDER. Note: This dude Chairs the House Judiciary Committee.
|
|
|
It seems to me that if there is an ultimate guilty party here, it is the politicians (mayor, city council, governor, etc.) who decided to let a mob run amok.
People have a right to defend themselves, should have a right to defend their property when law enforcement abdicates their responsibilities.
These celebrities whining about the verdict go out in public with private security guards, then preach about defunding the police.
Hypocrites!
|
|
|
My god spanner... give it up
It doesnt matter that Rittenhouse didnt own the car lot. The criminals that set it on fire didnt own it and certainly didnt have any "rights" to do the deed.
When anarchists take to the streets and cause mayhem I dont give a flip who puts a bullet through their skull. And you wouldn't either if you were a law abiding citizen who contributes to the good of society.
You got that?
|
|
|
"Rittenhouse wasn’t defending his property. He didn’t own the used car lot. He wasn’t defending people. At best he was defending the profits of the company that insured the used car lot."
Are you REALLY that stupid?
GT
|
|
|
Send Rittenhouse with his rifle and medical kit where he is needed, to Rotterdam.
Vigilante property protection and naive, inexperienced injury care needed.
|
|
|
“ I’m sure he didn’t bring an assault rifle to a riot with the intent to shoot anyone. He brought that AR-15 with him in order to put out fires and render medical aid, right?”
1. An AR-15 isn’t an assault rifle. You clearly know nothing about guns.
2. The rioters who got shot by Rittenhouse originally attacked him because he put out a garbage can on fire with a fire extinguisher that they were wheeling toward a gas station to blow it up.
3. Video evidence shows him on camera rendering aid to people at the riot who weren’t being violent.
4. You didn’t watch the trial clearly as these are all established facts.
|
|
|
How much is the left going to defend a convicted rapist, a convicted serial domestic abuser, and an admitted attempted murderer?
|
|
|
You forfeit your right to due process when you’re in process of attempting murder.
|
|
|
I remember a long time ago I CHP officer murdered a girl out in the desert on the way to Las Vegas. He was put on trial and acquitted. Then the federal government came in and arrested him for violating the young ladies civil rights and he was found guilty and sent to federal prison. I can see something like this playing out. Any way we will see.
|
|
|
The FBI and DOJ have no jurisdiction... just like they didnt when Georgia passed the racist voter ID laws.
"I think it's wrong to kill someone whose pointing a gun at you"...
Your completely stoopid spanner.
A true Lebowski type moron
|
|
|
“ I’m sorry you think it’s wrong to try and kill someone who is aiming a gun at you.”
So you think Kyle was in the right then?
Grosskreutz in his own words, under oath, admitting on the stand that Kyle did not shoot until a gun was pointed at him:
|
|
|
“ I don’t recall saying I knew much about guns but feel free to educate me by posting a precise definition of “assault rifle.””
A gun can’t be an “assault rifle” unless it’s automatic. An AR-15 is NOT automatic.
|
|
|
Spanner. It was legally for him to be armed with an ar15
Just stop without he would have been murdered or in the hospital severely injured. You need to take a long look at your morals defending violent criminal scumbags
|
|
|
Enough already
Just send Rittenhouse over to Spanner's house
No med kit needed, just AR-15
Problem solved!
|
|
|
very funny...lil pissant???
you had already chosen the side before this thing even happened AND even afterward you have chosen the side of a pedophile and other criminals.
jump kick man...look at his record...holy-shit
but keep picking the side of criminals...you do you
do you KNOW if any "rioters" had brought weapons to this shindig free-for-all??
|
|
|
Libtards are always just arguing without actually knowing the FACTS.
Spanner is a perfect example of that.
|
|
|
anybody taking bets on the red SUV running over dancing grannies at parade in WI. today?
|
|
|
Just a crazy MF did it..
|
|
|
saw a youtube clip...suv was hauling ass...seemed to be over 45mph
|
|
|
seen it too... Just plain crazy..
|
| There are 35 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
