Tulsi Gabbard comes out and calls john brennan & adam schiff domestic terrorists.
Damn, it's hard to believe this woman is a dem, she just seems to have far too much common sense for that party. Course that's probably why the far left dems like clinton can't stand her.
Atticus Finch
There are 49 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted.
"Damn, it's hard to believe this woman is a dem, she just seems to have far too much common sense for that party. Course that's probably why the far left dems like clinton can't stand her."
Right. Calling these people "domestic enemies" or "terrorists" isn't hyperbole. It's good common sense.
This is crazy and shows that the radical left is just as bad as the radical right:
"San Francisco to rename 44 schools with 'racist' namesakes, including Washington, Lincoln, Feinstein"
San Francisco will rename 44 schools, including campuses named after former presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln and Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
Article is linked.
Why can't we have more moderate people calling the shots? Why? Why? Why?
There's nothing wrong with, as Brennan said, uncovering insurgency movements on the left or right. This is not authoritarianism. It's intelligence gathering. And the government is limited in what they can do with this information by the Constitution and by laws. And lawmakers are limited in what they can do by the Constitution. I'm not worried.
You're not worried? You think there's judges that will protect you, and that piece of parchment actually means jack shit to them?
In November, multiple states violated the US Constitution and their own state Constitutions, which mandate that all national elections shall have laws and procedures put in place by the State Legislatures.
Governors, Secretaries of State, and Local Election Boards made changes to the state election laws and procedures, which is unconstitutional. Those changes had to be made by the legislature. From allowing mail-in ballots, to waiving the comparison of signatures on mail in ballots, to equal protection issues (mail in ballots faced far less scrutiny than ballots cast by in person voters), ignoring postmarks, to establishing the deadline dates when ballots had to be received.
Clear Constitutional violations and 14th Amendment equal protection issues...all ignored by the courts, and the worthless Supreme Court.
You want your Constitution to protect you? You better exercise your 2nd Amendment rights, because that's all you've got!
"And the government is limited in what they can do with this information by the Constitution and by laws."
Pre-Patriot act I'd have agreed with that statement, but we are living in a time when our law enforcement authorities at the federal level are using all kinds of backdoors to spy on journalists, representatives, senators and the list goes on. It has known no political boundary. These agencies are doing exactly what we were warned of using surveillance and manufacturing probable cause and evidence based on surveillance they were not allowed to use in the first place. Who were the masterminds of this strategy? The very people Tulsi named.
'she's moving up...needs a few more positions for seasoning and move more to center...maybe center right'
If she runs again she won't get any support from the dems, they hate her just look at what clinton and harris said about her. I think they hate her as much as they hated DJT.
Add to that she resigned from the dnc and called them corrupt so they're not going to rally behind her any time soon.
She's already pretty much in the middle and a lot of what she's said aligns with what djt was saying - putting Americans first, getting the U.S. untangled from foreign commitments, not being the world police etc.
But she is way ahead of the game - if clinton and harris can't stand you, you know you're doing something right.
Just got my Putin decoder ring and ID badge
You telling me that's a bad thing?
Wasn't that Hilary that said Tulsi was Putin's bitch, lol?
The same Hilary whose husband got paid $500k by Putin for an hour speech?
Some of you are seriously fucked up in the head
^ complete incompetent moron
You been hiding under a rock for the last couple of years?
Mueller spent 3 years and came up with nothing
Horowitz, a Dem lambasted our own agencies for having brought this abortion of an investigation upon our country based on a completely fictitious report paid for by the DNC
Trump is guilty of many things and was rightfully sent packing for being an ass
The Russian thing isn't one of them
Collusion is not even a crime, it has no legal meaning in terms of our penal code
I've disliked this putz for over 35 years
And, never voted for him
But this dog don't hunt
wondering how Horowitz is not catching more shit for his report...the shit coming out now in declassed docs are pretty fucking damning of the fbi and WHAT they knew, WHEN they knew it
"You been hiding under a rock for the last couple of years?
Mueller spent 3 years and came up with nothing"
GoBallsDeep,
So I take it you didn't read any of the Mueller report? Or even the articles (from credible sources) about what was in it? Have YOU been hiding under a rock for the last couple of years?
1. Mueller didn't spend 3 years.
2. A shit ton of evidence of wrong doing and coordination with Russians from Trump's campaign was found and listed in great detail. Pages and pages of it.
3. Trump's every move in regards to Putin during his term was to appease him. Putin got everything he wanted.
I could go on, but it's probably lost on you.
Facts matter. They are there for all to see. But it's up to you...
J502... please share ONE shred of evidence that Gabbard is connected to Putin... other than general, unsubstantiated statements by people she has criticized. (Cough cough Clinton/Harris)
Even Mayor Pete Booty said Clinton Should have to provide evidence to substantiate her claim. Here we are over a year later... still no evidence.
So... it’s weak minded idiots that simply repeat character smears simply because she criticizes your saviors.
I don’t like everything about Gabbard’s positions... but unlike you, I can disagree with people without villainizing them.
I don’t like President Biden’s policies... I disagree with with him... and will voice that... but I don’t have to make him into a monster.
It’s people like you that is making America an intolerable place.
Oh... and if it’s the “Russian Bot” angle. Every candidate in the primaries in 16 (Dem & Repu and in 20 (Dem) had Russian and Chinese bots pushing AND criticizing them on Social Media. Their goal is to sow division and wreak havoc on our political system. It’s Gomers like you that makes it work.
J502, you ignorant slut
I won't post any defense of Trump
I'm not a big fan of narcissistic blowhards who think they can schmooze dictators
But , yes I did read fair amounts of both reports plus additional redacted portions
You have no leg to stand on
This "play" by Hilary and the DNC was the most dangerous attempt at subversion and criminality since Nixon, harnessing the FBI and DOJ to spy on private citizens without proper legal protocols.i do not condone the Capitol building raid but that feeble rabble is nothing compared to using parts of our own government to effect an election.
Only the sheer incompetence of James Comey foiled the plot and, quite literally, handed the election to Trump......it was a true Keystone Kops moment.
If it had been anybody but Trump on the receiving end, i believe even brain dead idiots like you would have raised hell.
I know for a fact you didn't read any of those reports. If you had, there'd be no disagreement between us. What shocks me most is that Hilary was heavily favored, why did she feel the need to take extra-legal steps?
It's been suggested by the CIA reports that she did so in order to deflect attention from her email server scandal. Thats possible, but she had Comey, who had decided to give her a pass....even though his job is investigative, NOT prosecutorial.
What a clusterfuck and nothing that any future candidate or President should have to face, regardless of which party they're a member of.
Detroit, I'll be happy to pm my address so you can come personally to take my guns.
Would you enjoy the 12 gauge or the 9 mil shoved up your ass first?
Hoping you have the time soon to stop by for a spot of tea and some lead poisoning
Kaiser, I appreciate your skepticism and your challenge.
"J502... please share ONE shred of evidence that Gabbard is connected to Putin... other than general, unsubstantiated statements by people she has criticized. (Cough cough Clinton/Harris)
Even Mayor Pete Booty said Clinton Should have to provide evidence to substantiate her claim. Here we are over a year later... still no evidence.
So... it’s weak minded idiots that simply repeat character smears simply because she criticizes your saviors.
I don’t like everything about Gabbard’s positions... but unlike you, I can disagree with people without villainizing them.
I don’t like President Biden’s policies... I disagree with with him... and will voice that... but I don’t have to make him into a monster.
It’s people like you that is making America an intolerable place.
Oh... and if it’s the “Russian Bot” angle. Every candidate in the primaries in 16 (Dem & Repu and in 20 (Dem) had Russian and Chinese bots pushing AND criticizing them on Social Media. Their goal is to sow division and wreak havoc on our political system. It’s Gomers like you that makes it work.
So... post your EVIDENCE.
I’ll wait."
I don't know if I would equate what I wrote as "villainizing" anyone, but that is in the eye of the beholder. It seems however that you cannot disagree with me without "villainizing" me. Lots of name calling in there.
It doesn't take much evidence outside of her consistently repeating Russian talking points to know that she was a shill for Putin. As was Trump. Repeating an enemy's talking points is pretty close to the definition of being a shill. So the simple content of her speech and it's alignment with the official line of the Russian government is evidence enough. But you wanted more, so...
She also had a rather extreme and abrupt shift in policy and rhetoric a few years back, moving far to the right and in alignment with Trump and Russia. Russia state news spoke glowingly about her several times. One of the most unexplainable shifts was after being awarded the Champion of Freedom award by billionaire Republican mega-donor Sheldon Adelson for her support of the Netanyahu regime in Israel, she suddenly came out in support of Syrian dictator and slaughterer of his own people, Bashar al-Assad. You may recall Assad is a huge ally of Putin's. This shift left the hardcore Jewish community baffled.
She has espoused an anti-war message popular amongst some democrats. It was mixed with a call to lessen military intervention around the world. That's not an unreasonable position, but it does also serve Putin's interests. That in and of itself doesn't mean anything. But then she took a trip with a congressman with strong Russian ties, Republican Dana Rohrabacher, to meet with Egypt's strongman leader Sisi in 2015 and (as previously mentioned) expressed her support for Syria's strongman leader (and Russian ally) Bashar al-Assad. So she's supposedly anti-war and pro-dictator/slaughterer of their own people at the same time? Supporting al-Assad is something most Republicans wouldn't do, but it was exactly what Putin wanted. Incidentally, Republican Dana Rohrabacher is widely referred to as "Russia's favorite congressman" and Republican house minority leader Kevin McCarthy said on tape he believed Rohrabacher was on Putin's payroll.
And then, yes, there are the Russian bots amplifying her message on social media.
Taken as a whole, the evidence that she is doing the bidding of Putin is pretty clear. You've got to be paying attention though. Most of this stuff never makes a headline.
All of this can be founded reported by a wide range of credible sources. It's well known and documented fact. Just google it.
Trump didnt allow anyone to testify and shared no documents. What they did find was several Trump people working with Putin, lying about it, and Trump just pardoned them all. He was impeached for obstructing. If they investigate that now he would be outted. Who knows...when NY gets a hold of his tax returns, maybe they will find that he laundered billions for the Russians. But I expect the dems will let it go in Congress. If the shoe were on the other foot, the republicans would investigate 10 times....Hillarys emails anyone? The only reason Trump wasnt indicted was because Mueller went along with Trump's DOJ that a sitting President can't be indicted which would have to be tested before the SCOTUS. But the dems didnt try to force anyone to testify and instead led with the obvious obstruction....which was impeachable....but the Republicans were all tripping over themselves to endear themselves to Trump so there was no way that would go anywhere. Now that some have crossed party lines to vote for impeachment the rest of them have the knives out and want party blood spilled....because...Trump is apparently infallible.....and insurrections don't count. Heck if working with Putin against the U.S., tax fraud, working with terrorists, working with dictators, and lying to everyone so a pandemic can kill more Americans than WW2, who cares about obstruction. Just close Congress and the Supreme Court and let Trump tell us all what to do by Tweets.
Tulsi Gabbard is a big fan of Bernie's Socialist agenda. She supports Warren and Sanders domestic policies and you just referred to her as a very common sense woman. Forgive him magas for he knows not what he says.
GoBallsDeep, I think you read a different report. The Mueller Report listed numerous examples of obstruction of justice and numerous examples of coordination with Russians during the 2016 campaign.
Atticus you have no idea what you’re talking about! Donald J Trump was trying so hard with the help of the republican party to nullify a legal election and install himself as president in what can only be said an authoritarian fashion! Check out the rise and fall of Benito Mussolini.
I LOL'ed at Trump being able to coordinate with anything or anybody
The other thing that came out of the report was the sheer incompetence of Trump's crew as well as the government stooges following his people
Mueller felt compelled to write a massive tome when about 1 or 2 pages would have sufficed
The bottom line is they had almost no proof of anything
supposition this and maybe that
Glad you enjoyed the old SNL
For some reason I left out the "dried out, hagged up" part
“Taken as a whole, the evidence that she is doing the bidding of Putin is pretty clear. You've got to be paying attention though. Most of this stuff never makes a headline.
All of this can be founded reported by a wide range of credible sources. It's well known and documented fact. Just google it.
Evidence posted.”
Thank you for proving my point. No “evidence” was posted. Just opinion and an explanation of your opinion.
Brennan just pointed out what groups of people trump used for his lame attempt of an insurrection. She used the words "unholy alliance " and the fucking idiots take her serious. Did she just smear Adam Schiff without mentioning how he's destroying our country.? Of course the only reason she's on fox is she's a dem attacking a dem. Which makes her a useful idiot. Like Joe Lieberman, robert Kennedy jr, dick Morris...
).gif)
and in 20 (Dem) had Russian and Chinese bots pushing AND criticizing them on Social Media. Their goal is to sow division and wreak havoc on our political system. It’s Gomers like you that makes it work.
