| There are 45 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
|
|
Honestly I can’t tell if some of you are disingenuous or simply dumb as rocks.
|
|
|
What do you mean Skip? OP has a point. And since trying to throw Trump in jail isn’t working they are now aggressively misinterpreting the 14th amendment to keep him off the ballot. One thing is crystal clear. The Democrats do not want an orderly transition of power to someone elected by the people.
|
|
|
MA1 is drafting up a response as we speak
|
|
|
Well I'm sure the dnc will throw bidumb & harris out after the 'primary' and will 'appoint' their new candidate which I'm also sure will be obummer's 'wife'.
I'm also pretty sure her running mate will be gruesome.
Atticus Finch
|
|
|
Sure. Here's a response:
Republicans haven't won the popular vote in a presidential election since 1992!
That's 31 years!!
Republicans are desperate. They'll prop up a weak Democrat candidate, that sides more with Republicans than Democrats, as evidenced by a majority of RFK Jr's funding comes from Republican donors.
The Republican Party is suffering a long, slow death and you know it. The endless bitching in these blogs is evidence of that.
And Tom, can you guess who stopped the peaceful transfer of power on January 6, 2020? It wasn't the Democrats.
|
|
|
Again your hypocrisy knows no bounds. The Democrats mastered the art of propping up weak candidates in the congressional midterms. Just can’t seem to grasp the what goes around comes around concept. I didn’t hear you object in two years ago.
|
|
|
Also, the entire point of the electoral college is to make sure the three largest cities don’t determine who is president just based on the size of those cities. You act like the popular vote is an accomplishment.
|
|
|
Tom is leading by a very wide margin at this point.
Any other liberal rhetoric to be spewed ?
|
|
|
"Also, the entire point of the electoral college is to make sure that Democrat controlled cities and states don’t run up the vote tally with forged mailin ballots so they can keep claiming they won the popular vote. As if that matters and it doesn't. "
FIFY
|
|
|
Wrong. I was critical of the DNC at the time. They should have supported the non-MAGA candidates, but they knew the MAGA candidates would be easier to beat which is why they supported them. I thought that was a mistake.
Do you know how many times the peaceful transfer of power didn’t occur in our country’s history?
ONCE. By criminal Trump.
I’ll deal with your electoral college bullshit later…it had nothing to do with large cities.
|
|
|
Tom landed a check hook on MA1, MA1 is on chicken legs
|
|
|
Jr is revered by MAGA/Qanon crowds. Nobody in Democrats supports Jr.
He is a black sheep loser, having drug problems all of his life, and none of Kennedy family supported him, mayhe except for his wife.
GOP/MAGA's desperate attempt to confuse voters, that is all.
|
|
|
It had to do with northern vs south yes which at the time equated to big cities vs agrarian states
Most importantly, it exists because the founding fathers knew popular vote was not the way to go. It's not High School dude
|
|
|
You can read about the electoral college in the linked article.
It has nothing to do with political parties that didn’t exist at the time. It had a lot to do with slavery and encouraging Southern States to join the rest of the country.
It is currently the RNC’s only hope of winning a presidential election again.
It is antiquated and should be abolished. Republicans should change their positions to meet a majority of society’s beliefs. Now even Red states are going against Republican positions, like the 14 anti-abortion measures that were failed even in Red states.
|
|
|
Yes ma1 the democrat party is incapable of doing Shady shit
Now stfu and go enjoy a nice day in faggot land WeHo
|
|
|
This is Mildly Amusing...
"The Republican Party is suffering a long, slow death and you know it. The endless bitching in these blogs is evidence of that."
- As Republicans hold a majority in the House of Representatives...
- Republicans hold a 49-48 majority over Democrats in the Senate (Dems control due to 3 Independents -- Sanders, King, and Sinema. They may hold the majority in theory, but cannot control Sinema or Manchin at all, which pretty much makes the Senate a wash.
- Republicans control 56 state legislative chambers compared to the Democrats' control of 40.
- Republicans control 26 Governorships, compared to 24 for Democrats.
- Last I checked, the Supreme Court has 6 Republican appointees, vs. 3 Democrat Appointees.
If anyone has their panties in a wad over the current political state of America, it's Communists like Mildly Amusing, not the Conservatives. All they have is a geriatric bowl of rotting oatmeal in the White House, who can't even find his way on or off stage, let alone actually campaign for the Presidency in 2024...I have purchased 2 cases of Kirkland Organic Popcorn for the coming election season, as I know that Biden's mere participation will trigger a shortage!
|
|
|
I never said it had to do with political parties and it is about balancing states rights and federal rights same as the two houses of congress and three independent branches of govt. That's what libtards hate the 2 senators per state rule too. And want to expand supreme court because they don't like the composition.
Here's an idea...move away from extreme left and towards center and actually pick up more electoral college votes.
|
|
|
Ego…read more carefully.
I criticized the DNC for supporting MAGA Republican candidates in the primaries (by funding their campaigns) simply because they would be easier to beat in an election. It wasn’t unethical, but it didn’t send a good message on which Republicans the public should support. And it may have discouraged good, ethical Republicans from running.
|
|
|
Yellowb2 just dropped a payload from that B2 bomber on MA1 😂😂😂
Lmfao destroyed the leftist commie
|
|
|
B2 crushed MA in one, lol
CA population is the decider and we all know which way they lean.
Kinda dumb to even have a discussion about the "total" popular vote since it doesn't matter in presidential elections anyway.
The "national popular vote" is the sum of all the votes cast in the general election, nationwide.
The presidential elections of 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016 produced an Electoral College winner who did not receive the most votes in the general election.
Additionally, in 14 other presidential elections (1844, 1848, 1856, 1860, 1880, 1884, 1892, 1912, 1916, 1948, 1960, 1968, 1992, and 1996), the winner received a plurality but not a majority of the total popular votes cast. In only one election (1876) did a candidate win a majority (not just a plurality) of the popular vote but lose the electoral vote.
Hohum, much ado about nothing as the Electoral College is going nowhere.
Both sides can bitch all they like, so what..........
|
|
|
Fucking Biden is such a useless Communist at this point.
He arrested his primary GOP opponent... like four times.
He's going to suck up any Dem votes that aren't for him?... did I hear that right.
Total abuse of power.
If JFK were alive today he would be a Republican.
Today's Democrat party is a Marxist mob with no interest in the US Constitution or serving We the People.
|
|
|
Bunch of fucking commies, carpet baggers and faggots is what they are
|
|
|
Chose and then bitch the statistic that fits your agenda. Ignore everyything else.
|
|
|
@yellowB2
If the Republican Party isn’t dying, why did they…
- try to steal the 2020 election?
- why did Republican-controlled state legislatures use the false claims of voter fraud to pass suppressive voter laws? Why would you need to suppress votes if the public supports your positions?
- why the extensive gerrymandering?
Republicans are trying to hold power by the skin of their teeth. They are done.
Voters in even Red states have had enough, dealing multiple blows to Republican legislative overreach in the last 2 years.
It is widely predicted that Democrats will easily win back the House.
The Senate will still be close.
There is no way a Republican wins the Presidency in 2024.
The Supreme Court’s legitimacy as at an all-time low. You’d know that if you really were a lawyer.
Calling me a communist because I’m not a neo-fascist Republican is just pure ignorant.
|
|
|
One caveat. The Democratic Party is not a Marxist mob but it is a corporate party led by some of the most ruthless capitalists on earth. Marxists want the working class to rule. That is the last thing any corporate party wants. Their goal is to maximize profits while throwing a few sops to working people to keep them from rebelling.
|
|
|
Ma1 stfu your opinions are fucking retarded. B2 fucked you up there is nothing you can do to recover.
|
|
|
Somebody call Brad Raffensperger and tell him he's now a Democrat.
MA, now you know why everybody on the site hates you, lol.
Broad sweeping generalizations that aren't even on target.
It was, in fact, mostly Rep state officials that told FDT to pound sand.
And, oh yeah.....there was that Pence asshole who gummed up the insurrection too.
Sometimes you just get carried away with posting stupid..........and I get it
Being called a tranny faggot every other post is a bit annoying after a while.
Who gives a shit whether it's even true or not, it just gets old.
|
|
|
MA1 is usch a faggot retard. The supreme courts has NEVER been more legitimate. Just because you are sad over your precious Roe vs Wade. Oh boo hoo. This court is packed with constitutional scholars who know their job is to NOT legislate from the bench. Again, just because you don't like the outcome, the people and process is not the problem.
Grow up
|
|
|
Goebbels
You twisted fuck, I agree that honest and patriotic Republicans stood in Trump’s way of stealing the election. And most of the witnesses that will be testifying in the multiple cases are Republicans.
If anything, those Republicans are heroes.
I am not against all Republicans. Just the crazy, Far Right, QAnon, MAGA pieces of shit.
|
|
|
2 sides of the same coin that fuck all of us anyways.
Just dems are uber gay about it
|
|
|
Pete 😍
|
|
|
TomTraubert
I’ve been nice enough to largely ignore your idiotic posts, but you’re starting ad hominem attacks against, so let me vent…a little…
There is no situation where you and I would ever meet in real life beyond in a blog. If I had to create a profile of you, it would be of an uneducated, toothless, trailer park trash that feels life passed him by. And it did.
You’re merely an angry baboon playing with your shit, ready to throw it at anyone who crosses you. You have a blank look on your face almost all the time. When you appear to have the fleeting thought, it immediately disappears and you’re left with a blank look in your face once again.
To make yourself feel comfortable with your pathetic life, you find solace in insulting others in blogs on a site meant for men to meet women for the specific purpose of getting off. Strangely, you have no interest in seeing the women on this site. Your anger has left you completely impotent, so now you feel like you’re no longer a man. Which you aren’t. You’re just an angry, ignorant shadow of a human being.
Now run along and shoot up a school or church, like the human garbage that you clearly are.
|
|
|
And to address your post.
The Supreme Court for the first time is no longer perceived as being legitimate. You can thank the conservative Justices for that.
|
|
|
Lol at polite. You have never met me yet throw shade my way. You called me an antisemite because some hooker had it in her notes. That is you in a nutshell. Wrong. Questionable sources. No intellectual curiosity beyond gathering data that suits your narrative. Asking friends to PM me to give you a break. Sending me PMs asking me to give you a break. Acticing tough in RA
You are a weak commie faggot and of course we would never meet because you never go where real men meet. You think I will be standing on a picket line or rioting alongside BLM? No way. I don't hang out in tranny bars in WeHo and I don't shop at Erwheon or wear Lulu lemon or take pilates or any of the other faggot commie shit you do
lol at polite
|
|
|
You think I asked your friends to send you a message? You’re insane. Like Goebbels, I assumed you didn’t have friends.
|
|
|
Well I wouldn't call Ego MY friend but I assumed he was yours
|
|
|
Pete 😍
|
|
|
He is a friend, but I didn’t ask him to talk with you. Don’t you think it would be better to actually discuss the issues rather than simply attack each other?
And can you and your “friends” stop using female accounts to inflate your egos? Don’t you think that’s pathetic?
|
|
|
There you go again. I have nothing to do with these female accounts. You’re so fucking stupid. You don’t realize they are trolling me and you have so little concerned for the truth that you just gonna like assume that they are me for doing my building. I have nothing to do with them and there’s never been any interaction between me and any of them to give you reasonable suspicion. You sit here and laugh and conservatives who called bullshit on Russian collusion in the hunter laptop being a Russian plant can you call his conspiracy theorist, but look at you asshole. Your fucking wrong about everything.
|
|
|
And yes, I know that my last post have tons of typos I’m dictating and I really don’t give a fuck
|
|
|
Ok you are freaking me out now lol. I assume you know my old handle cause it’s on my profile. I don’t know any of your broads and unfortunately I do not have a nine inch schlong. Ask Pete
|
|
|
Any votes cast for another candidate in Iowa and New Hampshire will count.
Atticus your argument would at least be moronic instead of incoherent if you had a basic understanding of adverbs.
Illiterate peasant.
|
|
|
all votes should count you listed dipshit. stop making excuses for this assault on democracy and free elections
|
|
|
Heycocks1 is gay
|
|
|
Yellowb2 owns communist MA1
|
| There are 45 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
