| There are 50 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
|
|
I have long wondered why these agencies seem to be able to skirt around the rules here. Either they have a bait and switch by advertising providers that are not actually providing services, having multiple people operating under one profile, or as you so acutely saw, having multiple pictures of the same person on different profiles. Never understood why they were never called out for it or why this has never been acted on. Doesn't really apply to me since I have never seen them, but was always curious.
|
|
|
I believe the rule you're thinking of is you can't advertise the same person in the same area at the same time on more than one account. So if you had two accounts with the same person, one could advertise in OC > North > Anaheim saying they will be around today and on another account they could post an ad in IE > Ontario > Pomona saying they will be available in two days. Or the Anaheim one could advertise "visit me" and Pomona could say "I can visit you".
Since ads show up at the level of State > County, the two specific neighborhoods should be in different counties/general areas. So one in Hollywood and one in LAX or Long Beach are considered the same area and that would break the rule.
|
|
|
I may be very wrong; because I think that there is just one big Korean agency and each of its bookers gets a separate account.
|
|
|
The term is "cross-booking." It like booking a hotel on Travelocity, and finding the same hotel on booking.com.
Different operations. Different people answering the phone if you text. Same hotel., different bookers.
No, I'm not comparing ladies to property. Just an analogy.
|
|
|
"having multiple pictures of the same person on different profiles"
So, in my analogy, you would restrict booking.com, for example, from booking the Hyatt in Los Angeles if that hotel was already featured on expedia.com.
|
|
|
I don't think that's the same. It would more so be like if Hilton used 5 different brands to post the same generic room instead of different rooms that went with each level of hotel. This is one site with multiple handles posting the same girl.
Ive been told what's up though 
Have a great night peeps and stay safe out there 
|
|
|
No. You wrong. With all respect. It different bookers with the same lady competing for payouts. Book with Z booker, they get the prize. Book with X booker, they get the prize.
|
|
|
@ jindd1328 comment is my experience. Multiple bookers hawking the same talent competing for the booking fee. Frustrating but competitive pressures should cap the total package price.
More critical is the brokers credibility relative to real pics and experiences.
|
|
|
Yeah, catfish sometimes with some of these bookers.
|
|
|
Says vince2001 with no Asian bookers in his network.
|
|
|
I get what you're saying, but those sites are competing for a fee on each individual site (travelocity, booking.com, hotel.com,etc) and promoting the same places. Here it's the same site with multiple accounts promoting the same people. That's like me making 3 other account and posting the same stuff, but because I'm not a booker and just an individual it wouldn't be tolerated and that's fine because I understand/was told why it's allowed.
Agree to disagree on the perspective
|
|
|
Maybe this, maybe that. Maybe bait & switch so I just ignore such accounts.
|
|
|
It might not be “against the rules” or whatever, but it’s annoying that us indie girls had to pay to get out of quarantine and they just get to all use one guys account. Which ALSO in my eyes could present a safety issue, like sure ONE girls safe, but what about the new girl they’re baiting and switching today? If a girl ‘borrows’ an account and we find out, doesn’t the account generally get excommed? But it’s fine if it’s a booker??? Which is also generally frowned upon?
It also makes me super uncomfortable; I’ve been told that the girls are safe and a lot of them just come here for a month, make bank and leave happy, but like how do you know? Yanno? Idk the whole thing is weird to me. BEAUTIFUL girls and I’m sure they’re all sweet, no shade to them at all, but the whole things fishy to me. Just my thoughts though.
|
|
|
My agency is in Tijuana. When we opened in 1997 there was not much competition and even today we have the lion share of the work in Tijuana. I encourage the ladies to work on multiple sites as it gives them more opportunity to earn. I know there are agencies that frown on that but I work for the ladies, and they work with me and anyone else that they want. I wish that ladies would use the same name on all sites, but that can be difficult to pull off sometimes. The last thing I want to do is have ladies that feel I control them. I don't think there are many Tijuana agencies on this site but there is a least one other. We share some ladies.
|
|
|
@Redfish1, coming from a level Zero thats reviewing everything on my profile *Cringe*, I don't need a receipt to show you that I been or experienced somewhere. Also, profiles are deleted all the time, which would delete from my network, but they still keep your phone number part of their network, Rookie.
|
|
|
Kitty reading my mind ? I was thinking the same thing last night.
|
|
|
I generally don’t feel safe with those sites so I avoid them
|
|
|
When I see an account with twenty ladies on it I wonder who the ratings are for.
|
|
|
The hotel booking site analogy makes sense. What I wonder is how accurate are the pics? The body’s look fake enough but the faces just look unnatural
|
|
|
Most of the pictures are fake
|
|
|
The reality is that agencies probably produce the majority of revenue for the site through their advertising. If you will notice, a large portion of their ads are placed under "Prominence" which is 15/day in revenue for the site. A lot of these cheapskates on here don't spend 15/year on mail privileges. So don't be too critical of the agencies - without them, the site might have folded a long time ago!
I am in favor of only allowing blogging if that particular handle has mail privileges. Instead of "Mail Privileges" it should be called "Communication Privileges." And if a handle goes more than 6 months without communication privileges then they should not be allowed to even receive messages.
I don't believe that this site was ever intended to be a parking place for freeloaders (of either/any gender), nor should it be.
SUPPORT THE SITE BY KEEPING YOUR MAIL PRIVILEGES CURRENT (as a minimum).
We have a pretty good thing going here, let's not let it die from apathy.
|
|
|
^+1 I've never seen these agencies begging for FX points.
They are pretty organized on how to conduct business.
|
|
|
I would be cool if they charged points to write captions again in our photos.
|
|
|
How about 15 bucks a month to blog.????
|
|
|
That would work too!
Please don't get me wrong y'all, I wasn't complaining just confused.
I think those women are hot and will never through salt on someone else's business.
there's enough man meat to go around  
|
|
|
*throw
|
|
|
Hey younin y'all come here
|
|
|
How do ya’ll make that there yellow face emoji with a big grin, uplifted eyebrows, and smiling eyes, each shedding a tear from laughing so hard at Vince2001’s comment calling me a rookie?
Can I order 3 of them please?
Thank ya’ll in advance.
|
|
|
I think charging a fee to blog is a great idea.
|
|
|
I just came on here to say that your new profile picture is stunning Pk 🤤🤤🤤
|
|
|
Thank you so much Gorgeous
|
|
|
|
|
|
N8ked your pretty stunning yourself,
that lace is quite provocative PK,
a business with no sign,
is a sign of
NO BUSINESS
MARISSA I like the way you walk and talk and really show it off
|
|
|
All this pearl-clutching about dudes who don’t pay for mail makes me wonder: how much money does Humaniplex lose when five, ten or even twenty girls are on the same account?
|
|
|
I have a huge crush on you Ninja
One of these days *bats eyelashes*
|
|
|
Agencies add money by running ads.
If you're not buying $200 worth of points a year, you're not supporting the site.
That is a minimum amount.
|
|
|
Pretty kitty you are correct
I see it a lot
Although we can’t have two profiles/ they can with the same provider or two on 2-3 accounts
|
|
|
I think you two chics should beat the hell out of me.
|
|
|
An agency that posts one or two ads for ten or twenty girls isn’t spending that much to support Humaniplex.
|
|
|
It's the goddam Chinese I tell you. They come to infiltrate and ruin our economy.
I say, you honkys that patronize these foreign establishments are the very ones who help the axis of evil financially.
To that I say a very big FUCK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE UP ON.
BUY AMERICAN. MAKE IT IN AMERICA. STAY LOYAL TO AMERICA!
|
|
|
AAAAAND!
Fuck dual citizenship!
Pick a side motherfucker!
Fucking punks running to Isreal to fight with the IDF. STAY THERE THEN YOU FUCKING KEILBASA EATING CURLY SIDE BURN BLACK HAT BEARDED ASSWIPES!
|
|
|
You’re such a disappointment to me.
|
|
|
I'M MAD AS HELL......AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE !!!!!
|
|
|
Prominently are 24 from agencies single girl
14 non agencies
That is money
|
|
|
How do you know which ads, especially the ones for a single girl, were paid by agencies?
|
|
|
By the way, I’m rooting for you to meet a girl in 2023. It could still happen!
|
|
|
If you were curious you could go to the classifieds.
|
|
|
I will leave that to you.
|
|
|
That's where I got my numbers
|
|
|
I asked how you decided ads for single girls were placed by agencies.
|
| There are 50 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
