There are 50 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
|
Maybe you should move to Oregon.
|
|
The blue team has done a great job with San Francisco and Los Angeles.
It can't get much better than what they have.
|
|
About fucking time, when's he going after Jewjewbes?
|
|
Those things are anti-semite!
|
|
Fucking Warden!
As if we don't have enough problems getting our daily dose of transfats, now this?
The chemicals are red dye No. 3, bromated vegetable oil, potassium bromate and propyl paraben.
They say if you only eat just 89 lbs of these items daily, you'll have a greasy stool!
Duuuuh, how else ya gonna get that log out?
This bastard Newsome is causing constipation!
Right Butthead???
|
|
Harley's or whatever Grump rides is next.
And now he's in China sucking off pinger cause he knows he's going to be Pres.
|
|
ps, Did I read that right, Skittles band doesn't go into affect until 2027 ?
|
|
Old guy's ride
|
|
Pretty soon convicted murders will be eligible for parole.
Store owners will be fined for stopping shoplifting.
As San Francisco and Los Angeles sink into the great blue shithole.
Congratulations to the blue team.
|
|
NIce !
|
|
How did that recall election work out for you?
|
|
Whoever did that was an idiot, recalling a Dem in CA...........LOL
20 years ago it worked when CA was a bit more equal in voter reg......now, not so much.
One month from now, we'll see the Warden against DeSanctimonious........that should be interesting.
|
|
I think the republicans did that.
|
|
55% to 44%, pretty sure all the yeses to recall weren't just Pubs lol
But, you gotta belief system that you need to work within, so you do you.
|
|
I sure ain’t doing you..
|
|
You want to ruin something? Hand it over to the blue team, it won't take long.
Go bullet train. There we go pissing away money.
|
|
Feel free to start another recall.
|
|
Like has already been stated.
The state of California loves communism.
No way nuisance will be recalled.
George Gascón is there to help his fellow comrades.
I'm guessing you are one of them.
|
|
Convicted murderers are already eligible for parole depending on the classification of murder they committed. One of the Manson family chicks just got let out no too long ago. And that was about as heinous as a murder there's ever been.
|
|
If memory serves she was initially sentenced to death but that got overturned when they stripped the death penalty away in the 70's? Or 80's.
|
|
Son, you don’t even know what communism is.
|
|
I didn't know that bill passed.
I knew if you killed 2 people or less and had served 25 years, you were eligible for parole..
If that bill passed. SB 94
|
|
Leslie Van Houten served 53 years. She was sentenced to death but that didn't happen.
She should have been capped it would have saved a ton of money. Is more progressive bullshit.
It just goes to show you can get away with murder.
|
|
Have you always been this miserable?
|
|
Personally I think Van Houten should have rotted away in prison. I don't believe prison is designed to rehabilitate anyone. It's designed to store, punitively, people that society have deemed not worthy of being in society. That being said individuals can learn from their mistakes and actually self improve. Like Van Houten apparently did. But imo the heinous nature of the crime she participated in deserves no leniency. She should have died in jail for justice to mean anything
|
|
My lawyer friend says it’s more expensive to execute someone then to imprison them for life.
|
|
"I sure ain’t doing you."
Nope, you ain't got the skills.
|
|
Skills, LOL.
|
|
"My lawyer friend says it’s more expensive to execute someone then to imprison them for life."
Did he complete the explanation that the only reason is the endless appeals from people like him?
Pretty obviously, even in the People's Republic of Californication, it was voted on twice to uphold the death penalty. As I recall, Rose Bird stopped it back in the '70's/80's........then got removed by the People..
"Her reflexive opposition to the death penalty was a particularly sore point for her critics. Bird reviewed a total of 65[7] capital cases appealed to the court. In every instance, she issued a decision overturning the death penalty that had been imposed at trial, including that of serial killer Rodney Alcala. She was joined by at least three of the seven members of the court in 61 of those cases.[1]
In 1981, Bird ruled that the State Constitution required that the state provide free abortions for poor women.[8]
In 1982, Bird argued in dissent that the proposed California Proposition 8, known as the Victims' Bill of Rights, should not be allowed on the ballot.[9]
In 1984, Bird and a majority of the court granted the American Federation of Labor's 1984 original petition to block a balanced budget amendment proposition from appearing on the ballot.[10]"
Most recently, it was the Warden that stopped it.....against the will of the People lol
You can't make this shit up
|
|
The reason doesn’t change the fact. It costs more to execute a criminal than to imprison them for life.
Please tell us your definition of communism.
|
|
I was trying to be nice by leaving intelligence off the list but OK, we'll put it back on there right up with skills.
|
|
Gavin Newsom will more than likely be our 47th President !
Get used to it - at least for now it seems that there will be some excuse for Biden around May 2024 to bow out, and be replaced by Gavin Newsom !
|
|
The fact is that your lawyer friend is adding the cost of additional adjudication associated with the death penalty to the cost of the simple act of killing the criminal. That seems like an arbitrary comparison. One can simply modify the appeals process to any degree and change the calculation.
Which, by the way, is exactly what opponents of the death penalty did. They advocated for more and more appeals and impositions, got their way, snd NOW they claim that because of those same impositions, the cost of an execution is more than that of life imprisonment. As if they had no hand in manufacturing the impositions!
|
|
Lets hope somebody has a bullet w Newsoms name on it
|
|
How can one can simply modify the appeals process to any degree and change the calculation?
I’m all ears.
|
|
"one" can't simply modify the appeals process. That takes the courts discretion or change of laws through legislation. As it stands with automatic appeals as they're currently structured it's factually accurate that it costs more in actual costs to execute someone than to simply imprison them for life. Unless the inmate wants to actually accept his death sentence. While rare it does occasionally happen. One famous instance was Timothy McVeigh. He wanted to die. Told all his attorneys that was his wish and waived all his automatic appeals. They dusted his ass, as he deserved.
|
|
Seems like a constitutional issue to me. I don’t think you can “simply” eliminate due process for death penalty cases.
Did I just agree with GBD? Sorry about that.
|
|
I meant I.want. I get you guys mixed up.
|
|
My best guess is it would take legislation that would then have to be approved as constitutional by SCOTUS. But I'm not a lawyer, just a criminal lol
|
|
I also get mixed up on weird punctuation in your handles.
|
|
Lots of criminals here.
|
|
I'm definitely a democrat, GBD from just reading him my opinion is he's a republican that probably toys with libertarian leanings. Just my take on reading his posts
|
|
I don’t think about you guys that much.
|
|
The "." In my handle is because I've already used iWant as a previous handle years ago and you're not allowed to repeat handles. I've had 25+ handles since 2007 so plenty of retired ones lol
|
|
You must be special.
|
|
Still wondering when grumpy butt will figure out what he thinks the definition of communism is.
I won’t hold my breath.
|
|
SB 94, authored by Democrat Senator Dave Cortese, would allow inmates who were convicted before June 5, 1990 and have served at least 25 years to petition a judge to reconsider the possibility of parole.
If they capped her ass in the first six months the cost would have been much less than 53 years of incarceration.
SB 94, authored by Democrat Senator Dave another commie. Same dipshit that has another bill that says a store owner can be fined $20,000. if they try and stop a shoplifter or their employees do.
I wish you would hold your breath on a permanent basis.
Are you gonna put in two or three comments to lock this blog like you have been.
I would say you're the one that thinks they're special
|
|
I sure won’t let a communist like you tell me when I can post.
In case it went over your head, the communist thing is a joke.
Get back to me when you can tell me what you think “communist” means.
|
|
Damn Butthead, you just stepped in the middle of a ping pong match between twins separated at birth. Seriously, "Sons"..... how much longer does your "play dumb" act continue, cause its getting real old?
Asking stupid ass questions you already know the answer to, then posting more dumb. The appeals process has considerably lengthened time on death row, the latest being the farce that a cocktail of specific drugs is "cruel and unusual punishment". I can remember when Gary Gilmore requested and received a bullet to the head in Utah......now you can kill yourself with an aspirin bought on the street lol. Well, there's an answer for this bullshit, Nitrogen Hypoxia......... no pain, just sleepy-bye.....coming as we speak.
"There are generally three different appeals available to the defendant: a direct appeal to the state Supreme Court, a writ of habeas corpus to the state Supreme Court, and a writ of habeas corpus to the federal district court. (ibid)
The federal district court ruling regarding the habeas petition can be appealed to the 9th Circuit. That Circuit's ruling can be appealed to the US Supreme Court. (ibid)
"The Commission identified several points that are responsible for the long delays in California (ibid):
delay in appointing counsel for direct appeal (3-5 year delay)
delay in scheduling a case to the California Supreme Court (2.25 years between application and oral argument)
delay in appointing counsel for the state habeas petition (8-10 year delay)
delay in deciding the state habeas petition (22 months)
delay in deciding federal habeas petition (6.2 years)
delay in appealing the federal habeas petition to the 9th District (2.2 years)"
Why not just be honest and stop with the bullshit, "it costs more than incarceration". Just admit you don't like the death penalty, it's that simple and that's fine. Just take a stand and quit pretending you're starring in Dumb and Dumber Part 3.
|
|
#lasr
|
There are 50 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |