| There are 43 comments on this blog. |
|
|
Wheres the media on the train derailment in Ohio on Feb 3rd?...
Major Toxic chemical situation required controlled detonation of Vinyl Chloride which created a massive plume of toxic gas. Dead fish found miles away. Town is basically evacuated.
Crickets from the media.
The in the past two days there a two more train derailment incidents.. one in Houston and the other in South Carolina.
Nothing from our illustrious bafoon in the WH or the fudge packer Buttigieg who finally provided comments only in the last 12 hours on Twitter.
#Antifa
|
|
|
What the Media Isn’t Telling You About the Ohio Train Derailment
.
|
|
|
The party of deadbeats (democrats) covering it up just like the hunter Biden laptop lol
|
|
|
10 years ago it was shark attacks
Now, it's balloons
Guess train deraillments are passe
Cause there's probably a shitload every year
Was up close to one about 30 minutes after it happened to a freight train, when I was young'un.
Holy fuck!
2 inch steel sheared in half, cars piled on each other.
Nobody died, which was good.
|
|
|
MA1 if you see this I’m sorry. Just wanted to spar with democrats
|
|
|
yep...both of you DIAL it down
|
|
|
Fuck that
MA is a complete jackass with a god complex
Always short on facts, long on crap opinions
Always wrong but never uncertain
Worst DNA bouilliabaise on the site...............
Except for HeyISuckBigTime, of course
|
|
|
And more updates on totally random events...
Yet another train derailment in Detroit and massive plastics fire in Florida.
🤔
|
|
|
here's a black chick talking thru the nordstream 2 theory
maybe if she's black you watch it
|
|
|
Reviving an old discussion… this news is out today:
Denmark’s Armed Forces confirm Russian ship was seen near the site of Nord Stream explosion
|
|
|
Im just gunna say it, Amerika did it. Im glad I got that out my crack. I wouldnt leave such a delicate job like that to any other empire or would comedians. Were just bring hope and change and a new way of life to Europe.
I suck cock,
But only when I cant have pussy.
Fuck off
|
|
|
So given that Russia owns and maintains the underwater pipeline is it really any surprise that a Russian vessel capable of underwater operations with a mini sub was in the area four days prior?...
|
|
|
Well, following that logic: Prez Brandon directly, months before, said it would be taken offline one way or another. Very major cabinet members said the same thing. Now I take people at their word. If they say the pipe line will be taken offline, then they probably took it offline. Achums Razorish right.
I like taking it in the ass,
Why she is sucking it dry.
What do I know?
|
|
|
The only people claiming that it was the US who blew up the pipeline is a journalist with a tarnished reputation, Russia, and right wing media.
Way to go giving Putin/Russians (our sworn enemy) the benefit of the doubt over us. But as long as it fits the GOP's narrative, right? Clowns.
|
|
|
U mean the Pulitzer Prize winnng journalist Seymour Hirsch. His work stands for itself. U seem to be using talking points. Please gotta do better than that. Stop watching msnbc and cnn. Think for yourself.
|
|
|
So just because a Russian ship was seen near the site, you declare them guilt. Typical.
Just haven't come to grips that the CIA has had a hand in just about everything.
The proof is out there, so is the disinformation for cover ups.
|
|
|
yep...i hate it more than most as you know where i stand on taking putin down
BUT you seem to always be for shutting any opposing view points down...be done with all of fox news
that is a state to be in...with just one side of things
i came out initially and said it was putin...it's still possible, the dude wanted to inflict the most pain on europe and he would have an excuse of not being able to deliver the energy...which btw he is delivering to india/china/japan. not in the same amts, but they might be getting there as pipelines are built
|
|
|
When I throw the bones down, heres what they tell me.
1. Current proxy war in Ukraine started in 2014
2. If the US wanted peace it would have happened. We want war
3. The world is dividing again. Cold War redue
4. The factions are starting to line up. BRICS on one side, ours on the other.
5. The dollar will not remain the world currency, unless we do it at gun point. This is the worst of it all.
Make as much money as you can.
Climb the latter as high as you can.
Maybe, that will shield you, maybe.
Revolutionary times we live in.
Transformational
|
|
|
when they brought up russia at the peace table...it's bullshit
|
|
|
It's obviously possible that the US blew up the pipeline, but as I said before, it would have been a complete disaster if it were discovered that we were behind it.
If Russia is discovered to be to blame, would any of us be surprised? Would Russia even care considering how they shrug off the reports of beheadings, child torture, targeting civilians, unconscionable raising of entire cities, etc.
I'm not naive to believe that the US acts altruistically. We want what's in our best interests, I don't think blowing up the pipeline is necessarily in our best interests because Europeans (especially Germany) has a public that is against supporting Ukraine in order to get cheaper fuel prices. That puts pressure on Nato, which then diminishes Nato's ability to keep the coalition together.
Yes, Ukraine is fighting this war party by proxy for us. It is in our best interest that Russia is weakened and loses this war (since they are our sworn enemy) buy Europe has way more to lose. If Ukraine falls, Putin indicated that he would continue on to gobbling up Poland, Belarus, Hungry, etc., in an attempt to bring back the Soviet Union together, and the rest of the world would be in a much weaker position to fight communism.
|
|
|
agree
|
|
|
i thought they said it was the people on the sailboat which they found at an abandoned shipyard in germany.
i think will remain a mystery but i am not surprised if US did it and i think the allies maybe not happy about it but understand the reasoning behind it.
somehow europe needed to be weened off cheap russia energy, the dependency was/is too much of a threat.
|
|
|
yep...this lil germany/euro energy situation aged pretty well from a few years ago
|
|
|
^ As Ed McMahon used to say...
"You are correct sir"
|
|
|
Mild, heres my thought on what you said above
Climate change agendas are all over the west. Real or not the cc agenda is becoming law in NATO countries. Russia is not on board. They only really have fossil fuels to export. They have food and others, but a lot of oil, natural gas. These are there countries economic drivers. All these fossil fuels are on the climate change naughty list.
Why would we blow up a pipeline. The US also has a shit ton of fossil fuels. Oil, natural gas, etc.
My opinion: Ultimately. The US wants to supply europes need for natural gas. Since natural gas will be around in NATO countries for awhile while we are forced into clean energies. It makes sense to me that we would be cutting off europes ability to use Russian natural gas
ASIDE - We, NATO, are fucking over Germany. Were actually putting them back in their subservient position to us.
For fuck sake. These natural gas pipelines have been vigourously fought over at the global level for awhile now. My opinion, thats why the Ukraine thingy ( poxy fuckn war) actually started in 2014.
Hold it tight,
Feel it explode.
Release the energy.
|
|
|
that and russia want to make sure they have the monopoly energy traded to the EU...the other former russian states are sitting on a bunch of energy and russia is making sure it all runs thru them VS pipelines getting around it
|
|
|
most of the pretext for war was bullshit...it's about energy and mostly russia's only source of income
|
|
|
FISH - fuckn A
|
|
|
Help me understand what you two are saying here.
Didn’t Putin think the war was going to last a week or two tops? He thought Zelensky was weak and would flee the country immediately after the war started. He also thought after Ukraine falls and gets gobbled up by Russia, Poland and other former eastern block countries would follow suit and a new Soviet Union would be created.
When the war continued, NATO countries imposed sanctions. Those sanctions included cutting off or at least reducing Russia’s ability to sell oil, its largest export, which made them the money needed to fund the war. .
Of course blowing up the pipeline would help that cause, but NATO didn’t start the war. Putin did. The war started on February 24, 2022. The pipeline explosions occurred on September 26, 2022. That is 8 months later.
I understand the logic of what you’re saying, but there was a long delay in blowing up the pipeline after the war started. Shifting Europe’s fuel needs to the US was clearly not the ”reason” for the war. If it were, you wouldn’t wait 8 months before blowing it up. The war could have ended before that occurred, then Russian couldn’t be used as the scapegoat to blowing it up.
A more plausible explanation of why Russia blew up the pipeline is that sanctions were becoming increasingly painful for Russia by the time the pipeline was taken out. Russia was starting to hurt for money to support the war that was taking way longer than Putin expected, and the German public were complaining about high fuel prices and the threat that they’d skyrocket during winter when the cold would increase demand.
German officials wanted to buy fuel from Russia but still wanted to appear to be tough on Russia and in solidarity in its role in NATO, so I think Russia blew up the pipeline itself and continued to ship oil to Germany via trucks and ships undercover. Russia gets the funds it needed, Germany gets the fuel it needed to placate the German public, and Germany continues to look like they were continuing to support the sanctions on Russia because no one knew that they continued to buy the fuel from Russia via other means than the inoperable pipeline.
|
|
|
My 2cents:
Mild, your position seems very mainstream. Your points seem to be fairly accurate for mainstream. They seem very solid for corporate media. Im not interested in that narrative.
Corporate media, mainstream media is fully designed to front for US corporate interests. They speak the truth from time to time, but the narrative is to serve the empire.
Look outside that bag of cats. The Putin started it narrative is to simple. International grievances usually have 2 sides. Go read about the run up from 2014 on. Its fascinating. CIA Coup, war, Donbas breakaway, Russia complains about NATO encroachment. There was a international deal signed back than, that the US broke. Etc.
I laid out many examples above exploring the narrative. My position is not mainstream. I stand by my points.
Are my points inaccurate? Do I misunderstand the topic? Etc.
Good example is, member when you said that Seymour hirsch was a liar. I said, that mans won every journalist award there is. He even won the Pulitzer. My point is that Seymour hirsch is not a run of the mill propagandist. Hes a creditable journalist. His body of work is credible. Its possible hes wrong, but improbable.
I like to stroke it with oil and latex.
Bring that bitch to a furious rage.
Then slide it into a mouth and cum.
|
|
|
Im gunna address each point individually.
1. When the war continued, NATO countries imposed sanctions. Those sanctions included cutting off or at least reducing Russias ability to sell oil, its largest export, which made them the money needed to fund the war.
——- Did you know that Ukraine, currently 2023, is buying diseal fuel from Russia. That’s used in the war effort. Odd, but they are.
2. Of course blowing up the pipeline would help that cause, but NATO didnt start the war. Putin did. The war started on February 24, 2022. The pipeline explosions occurred on September 26, 2022. That is 8 months later.
——-NATO chose not to negotiate with Putin over several year surrounding the real issue from 2014.
3. I understand the logic of what youre saying, but there was a long delay in blowing up the pipeline after the war started. Shifting Europes fuel needs to the US was clearly not the â reason for the war. If it were, you wouldnt wait 8 months before blowing it up. The war could have ended before that occurred, then Russian couldnt be used as the scapegoat to blowing it up.
——It wasnt long. Our top officials publicly said the US was gunna end the pipline one way or another. Go watch uncle joe say it out of his own mouth. Its improbable that Russia destroyed its own pipeline.
4. A more plausible explanation of why Russia blew up the pipeline is that sanctions were becoming increasingly painful for Russia by the time the pipeline was taken out. Russia was starting to hurt for money to support the war that was taking way longer than Putin expected, and the German public were complaining about high fuel prices and the threat that theyd skyrocket during winter when the cold would increase demand.
——- I fundamentally dont believe this. Russia took awhile to figure out its strategy, ok. Russia capabilities look underwhelming, yes. Russia is going to get along just fine selling its fossil fuels to India, China, Brazil, South Africa and anyone else in that bloc.
5. German officials wanted to buy fuel from Russia but still wanted to appear to be tough on Russia and in solidarity in its role in NATO, so I think Russia blew up the pipeline itself and continued to ship oil to Germany via trucks and ships undercover. Russia gets the funds it needed, Germany gets the fuel it needed to placate the German public, and Germany continues to look like they were continuing to support the sanctions on Russia because no one knew that they continued to buy the fuel from Russia via other means than the inoperable pipeline.
——- I think the Germans realized too late what it all means to their economy. Fuck the Germans. Dumbshits. They can only prove 8 to 10% of their power being generated by renewables. That means those fuckers need 90% of their power from fossil fuels. And they are the poster child for renewables and clean energy. Theyve been lying about renewables and replacing their energy needs for a long time. Currently, 2023, The Germans have fired up COAL plants because of there lack of vision. Fucking COAL plants, the worst polluting energy out their. Dumbfucks.
|
|
|
I don't trust the Germanic people. In fact, I don't trust any european trashy pasty pale people.
God's wall. It's called the ocean. They breached the wall, and now look at the mess we're in.
|
|
|
right before winter started to inflict the most punishment
|
|
|
putin KNOWS the ship has sailed in regards to future energy sales to EU...they are moving on with china and other countries
only a new leader in russia would help them get back into the decent graces of EU
|
|
|
@ jake2k69
I think my explanation of what happened is more probable in being true, but I could be wrong.
|
|
|
@Mild. fair enough, thanks for sharing
|
|
|
the swedish and danish governments have still not concluded their investigations or will not.
Germany, Denmark and Sweden told the U.N. Security Council on July 11 they could not say when their investigations would be concluded.
Sweden's special prosecutor in charge of the investigation, Mats Ljungqvist, told Reuters on Sept. 20 he aimed to conclude the investigation before the end of this year.
The German federal prosecutor office told Reuters it could not comment and Danish authorities also declined to comment
now this is strange:
Russia has asked the U.N. Security Council for an independent investigation but failed to win support, except from China and Brazil.
whaaat?
|
|
|
All you have to look for is WHO or WHAT country benefitted from this.
The ONLY country that is currently making a killing off natural gas against Germany is USA.
USA is the ONLY nation making obscene amount of profits at ridiculously inflated pricing on natural gas after the bombing. And with this, USA also gained more leverage and control over Germany as we now control their lifeline and further economic development as we control their energy.
There is no doubt USA bombed that pipeline. First you make Russia lose. then EU lose, and make EU more dependent on USA and NATO.
The most unexpected BIGGEST WINNER out of this whole UKR-RUS conflict is India and China. They are killing it over cheap food and cheap gas/oil. This war is making China win like no other. It even made BRICS much stronger. And didn't we claimed that China was helping Russia all along but in fact China would WANT Russia to fail in Ukraine because it would weaken Russia and make Russia even more dependent on China. It also gave opening from all the Central Asian nations to become much more close to China on One Belt One Road.
That clear single BIGGEST WINNER is clearly China here. Siberia is now open for business to the Chinese. Their food problem in China is now resolved. Their energy is also secured with Russia building more pipelines to China and that Berlin-Russia-Beijing highspeed railway is now a go. China is losing its mind on winning so much. The other nation is USA. We are killing Japan, Korea and Europe on making huge amount of profits off this war and China/Taiwan's tension over UKR/RUS war is also letting US to make obscene amount of arms sales to Taiwan.
China and USA are winning BIGLY over this.
|
|
|
It was Taylor Swift, that bitch is everywhere bombing shit.
|
|
|
fuck, where do we start with that
|
|
|
China wins again...
No surprise with Brandon in the WH
|
|
|
interestingly the most likely scenario was the correct one..
ukraine did it, without notifying anyone or asking for permission.
|
|
|
^^
It's also been said that staging it so Urkrane holds the false flag is pretty likely as well.
Don't matter, the true cause of it will likely never be 100% certain.
What we do know for certain through is Putin invaded Ukraine, and likely wants Russia to revert to it's old ways..... not communism, but OLD Russia, land of the Tsar.
|
| There are 43 comments on this blog. |
