| There are 50 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
|
|
Obviously, nobody here gives a shit about these political shenanigans on both sides.
The malaise has set in and we're all resigned to the 2 worst candidates in the history of the Republic.
Pretty fuckin' sad
|
|
|
Believe it or not, the State courts have no Standing to do so. Standing lays only with Congress.
|
|
|
The 4 attorneys I have seen on Newsnation and CNN predict the Supreme Court will strike down the Colorada and all of them stated they would not be surprised if it is a 9 - 0 decision. If they don't there are a number of red states looking at removing Biden from their state ballots.
I guess we will see soon enough.
|
|
|
How many times do I have to say it ?
2024 election year will be unlike any other in the USA 's history !
Total Mass Hysteria !!!
Big Meeting yesterday was epic as was the after party at the edition !
|
|
|
"Obviously, nobody here gives a shit about these political shenanigans on both sides"
On the contrary, if no one in government or in any public forum speaks out against Trump and his minions' attempt to subvert our democratic processes, this fragile experiment in a democratic government by the citizens of a United States will not survive a second term by a wanna be athorateroian and self proclaimed "dictator for a day".
|
|
|
wanna be athorateroian and self proclaimed "dictator for a day". ????
did you SEE the full clip? don't be a fucking moran
|
|
|
And the Secretary of State has that authority?
Really????????????????????????????????
What proof is she using about insurrection? Her fucking opinion??????????????????????
Wake up America...The left is trying to take over this country from within.
Hell, we don't need to worry about China, Russia, Iran, North Korea.
We need to worry about our own government.
Maybe next, we should see some Red State Secretary of State remove Biden from the ballot since he is not enforcing our border.
|
|
|
Secretary of State took her time to disqualify Trump going “by the numbers”, just to cover her ass so dipshits could bitch and complain but cannot do anything about it because that is her responsibility.
Guess what?
He’s off the ticket.
Here we go again, jazz.
Take it.
Take it deep up the ass, til you feel it in your tonsils.
The fucking reciprocity for following the Orange Shitgibbon.
|
|
|
"What proof is she using about insurrection? Her fucking opinion??????????????????????"
@jazz51
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
"shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion"
It doesn't say determined by a court of law or convicted of participating in an insurrection. Nevertheless, courts across multiple states have determined that Trump participated in the insurrection. In fact, Trump was given an opportunity to present evidence otherwise and he failed to do so.
|
|
|
It might be best to actually read the Secretary of State's (Maine) actual findings before questioning her right to act on this matter.
|
|
|
Jazz can’t read.
He has problems find his pud often mistakes it for old wart scabs.
Supreme Court may overturn Colorado, but Maine’s decision and methods make it harder.
(That’s right, jazz, you like it hard up the inverted penis of yours.)
|
|
|
Haley / Desantis 2024
Trump won't be the RNC candidate !
|
|
|
Sherkahn has had his pm privilege removed. Please help him he can't afford to help himself.
|
|
|
If you can't beat him, remove him!
|
|
|
After reading the Maine ruling it is pretty obvious that they are trying to force the USSC to take it up and make a final decision on it soon. One of the main points made in that ruling is essentially a "states rights" issue, which is hard to argue with. I think the Maine ruling is going to encourage a few other states to follow suite real soon.
|
|
|
"don't be a fucking moran" 
Seriously, what a dunce this dtfaggot is.
I was referring to the fact that it'd been 3 hours since comrade gloom had posted and nobody on the site said shit lol
If we're going with the whole "threat to fragile democracy" thing
There'd be a double hanging tomorrow and we'd have all new nominees
|
|
|
"Democracy is sacred,” wrote Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows.
Therefore I'm taking away your democratic right to vote for the orange POS.
You cannot make this shit up.
|
|
|
"Democracy is sacred,” wrote Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows.
Therefore I'm taking away your democratic right to vote for the orange POS.
You cannot make this shit up.
@Goebbels
Are you off your meds again?
Trump participated in an insurrection. He attempted to overturn the legitimate results of an election to retain power. He is disqualified to hold office because he acted against the Constitution. That is how she is helping preserve democracy.
But I don’t think it will be successful because the conservative majority of the SCOTUS will figure out a way to help Trump out. The DC Circuit Court of Appeals will rule against Trump’s immunity claim and I think that SCOTUS will refuse to hear the case, thereby affirming the decision, allowing for the January 6 case to proceed before the election.
That is a fair outcome because Trump will be convicted (and he knows it) and he will lose the election assuming he’s allowed to proceed as the Republican candidate.
|
|
|
I can read. He has not been charged with insurrection, nor has anyone else associated with June 6. And certainly no one has been convicted. In this country I thought we had a belief that you are innocent until PROVEN guilty. Guess people on the left have decided to abandon that belief. We are turning into a banana republic and you are all oblivious to it. If this is going to be the precedent, we are all now guilty of a number of crimes and you are all going to jail. No charges brought, no indictment, no trial, just conviction based upon an opinion.
|
|
|
Mildly… glad you can find Section 3. Of course you should have read Sectiion 1 before you made a fool of yourself quoting Section 3.
|
|
|
I was thinking the same thing. States Rights, should over rule.
|
|
|
If Trump wins...
Sherkahn
MA1
and all Hx Liberals alike ...
Will join in unity at the park by IHOP at Sunset & La Cienega - you know the one @ MA1
and you will all pay homage to the Orange Man by washing his feet and sucking his toes !
|
|
|
“….no one has been convicted in this country….”
What planet are you on?
Here’s the list of convicted traitors.
|
|
|
Another person on the left who cannot READ.
I said NO one was convicted of insurrection.
Trump hasn't and neither has anyone else.
So until someone is actually convicted of insurrection, how can you call what occurred an insurrection in the context of Section 3 of the Constitution. The Civil War was the insurrection that was addressed in Section 3 and what happened on Jan 6 certainly doesn't fit that definition.
For those too lazy to search to read Section 1....here is it. What do you not understand about Due Process of Law? I don't care how much you hate Trump....yes, he can be a total asshole, a pompous blowhard, etc. But we don't alter our Constitutional rights to get him. But many idiots on the left don't give a shit about anything but power. They will trample the Constitutional rights of a citizen to get their political enemy. We are no better than a banana republic.
Fourteenth Amendment
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
|
|
|
Marissa....YOU also should carefully read Section 1. Trump has not been accused, indicted or convicted in Maine. How the heck can they say he is guilty of insurrection?
|
|
|
“But many who follow Trump on the right don't give a shit about anything but power.”
Fixed it for you.
Now you have your facts right.
Or did you ignore that the GOP followed Trump’s playbook about flaunting law and ethics and made moves to hold on to power that have been overturned by the courts.
Back on topic.
Texas, Oregon and New Mexico are making similar moves to take Trump off the ballot.
|
|
|
The Republicans are not blameless here, but the Dems are taking this shit to an all time high. Of course the Supreme Court will bitch slap all of this bullshit by the left. It is unconstitutional. I will repeat again since you seem to be missing the point ….how can it be an insurrection when no one has been even tried for insurrection? And certainly no one has been convicted and especially Donald Trump.
|
|
|
My point was not necessarily in favor of the ruling as much as a feeling that the entire action was structured solely to force the USSC's hand. Structuring it as a states rights issue is the most forceful way they could do it. The SoS left plenty of wiggle room in that ruling and seems to even suggest that the ruling may be overturned, but at least the issue will be resolved once and for all (hopefully).
It is important to realize that the SoS did not unilaterally give birth to this action, it was in response to a civil proceeding initiated by a couple of citizens.
Also keep in mind that keeping DJT off of the ballot is a civil proceeding, not a criminal one. The rules for a finding of guilt or innocence are very different. In a criminal case it requires a finding of guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt." In a civil case, like this one, it only requires a "preponderance of the evidence." There "seems" to be plenty of evidence (albeit it mostly circumstantial - at this point) that DJT knew exactly what he was doing.
Another thing that caught my eye was that DJT's attorneys screwed up again in failing to timely file exhibits in the Maine action. His years of stiffing attorneys on their fees is coming back to haunt him in that he is now saddled with 2nd and 3rd string attorneys. The most competent ones (and the most expensive) won't touch him. You reap what you sow - that's why he seems to be constantly coming up empty these days.
This whole thing is developing into a great lesson in civics.
|
|
|
Is it not clear that people who continue to support Trump are essentially traitors who are too dumb to understand that they are supporting an anti-democratic, wannabe dictator? Or worse, you know you’re supporting a traitor and you don’t care.
Do you want to see another insurrection? How can you lie to yourselves and not call it what it is? Are your memories that bad that you can’t think back three years to what happened that horrific day?
And Trump was being investigated for his crimes at least a year before he decided to run for president again. So now you’re dumb enough to believe his spin that the prosecution is politically motivated? His running for president is clearly his attempt to stay out of prison. It’s his only hope. The evidence against him is overwhelming.
This is not Democrat vs Republican. This is Trump vs American Democracy.
Haley is a legitimate Republican candidate because she at least respects the guardrails that are formed by respecting the Constitution and democracy.
Wake up already.
|
|
|
“ how can it be an insurrection when no one has been even tried for insurrection? And certainly no one has been convicted and especially Donald Trump.”
So to play your game, Jazz, clearly you’d like the January 6 case to be tried in March or at least prior to the election so that the American publican can be well informed about the candidates that are running for president. Right? Isn’t that what you want?
If you claim it’s a political prosecution, then you’re trying to have it both ways. He hasn’t been prosecuted and he can’t be tried. Fuck you.
Put on your big boy pants and shut the fuck up.
|
|
|
mildly...Jan 6 has been tried over and over again. Hundreds of people who were involved have been accused, some took plea deals and some were tried....NONE for insurrection. Most for trespassing, disorderly conduct, interfering with law enforcement officers, a few assaults....again NO ONE charged or convicted of insurrection.
So, at some time, people on the left need to find a new word besides insurrection to apply to the Jan 6 people and definitely to Trump, since he said to go PEACEFULLY to the Capitol.
"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard,"
|
|
|
In·sur·rec·tion
/ˌinsəˈrekSH(ə)n/
noun
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
What happened that day? A violent uprising against our government.
Those who have been prosecuted for their participation that day don’t need to be convicted of “insurrection “ for participating in the insurrection.
|
|
|
Yes, so violent. All of the riots during the summer of 2020 were far more violent than Jan 6th.
Yes, they were going to overthrow the government with flags, banners, walking sticks. I think there was two or three people who were allegedly carrying a firearm on the grounds...NONE inside the Capitol building.
How many shots were fired that day.....oh, that's right, by a Capitol police who killed an unarmed woman.
|
|
|
mildly...by your definition, most of the riots in the summer of 2020 were insurrections also....how many of those people have been convicted......crickets, crickets, crickets.
If the left didn't have a double standard, they wouldn't have any standards at all....LOL.
|
|
|
Here’s another example.
BLM rioters can be convicted of arson, assault, robbery, etc. Do they need to also be convicted of disturbing the peace, rioting, or whatever the underlying act they were doing before they committed other crimes? No.
What occurred on January 6, 2021 was by definition an insurrection. They were insurrectionists. Trump knew exactly what he was doing. He knew many in the crowd had weapons. He was warned of it. And he said I don’t effing care that they have weapons,” He said he knew they weren’t there to hurt him. So why did they have weapons at a rally?
|
|
|
So. Mildly .. and others
This “insurrection’ happened on January 6, 2021 correct? We are about to mark the 3rd anniversary of said event. So .. in 3 years .. with a stacked Democrat run government, a completely stacked “Commission”, a notoriously left leaning media and social media, a compromised FBI and what all,of you state to be a slam dunk case. Tell me … why is Trump still around? Not behind bars .. not in hiding.
Honestly, the fascination and fixation on Trump by the left is astounding to behold. If you would simply ignore him .. he’d go away. Instead .. he’s the most effective click bait in the world.
Don’t you realize that Trump is literally the only Republican candidate that you have a chance to defeat? He is the ONLY candidate that will inspire the Democratic base to vote. Trust me … all of this political theater is only helping the Republican cause. The fact that you don’t see that .. is frankly the funniest part of all of this.
|
|
|
I’m sorry, Lucky, but where does it say in the white Jesus bible that Trump is safe from arrest and conviction for actions and crimes while in office?
Being kicked off the ticket across the states is just one of the consequences he should have thought about when he thought he would get away with crimes and fools would support him blindly.
|
|
|
the libby jerk fest is so out of control
glad you are getting behind the latest from maine. she sounds like a frigging loon
Maine Democrat who barred Trump from ballot met with Biden twice, called Electoral College 'white supremacy'
|
|
|
Lucky
What is pathetic is the range of explanations and excuses used by his supporters to defend Trump.
Question: This happened 3 years ago, so why isn't Trump convicted/in prison?
Answer: It takes time to build an airtight case against a former president, and it takes careful preparation. They need to make sure that he is in fact guilty of crimes prior to filing claims against him.
And if cases were brought against him in just a few months after the insurrection, what would you have said?
Why is the left rushing to judgment?
Why are they railroading Trump?
Isn't it a political prosecution?
By the way, it isn't the left that is prosecuting him. Almost all of the witnesses are Republicans. Many of the judges hearing the cases and appeals were appointed by Trump and other Republican presidents. The head of the FBI is a life-long Republican.
Get your facts straight and understand what is happening. Stop listening to conservative media and actually give a shit about the future of this country.
|
|
|
The head of the FBI is a life-long Republican.
stop it
|
|
|
Rather than blindly question things, look up Christopher Wray for yourself. Wray has always been Republican.
Wray was frustrated when questioned by Republicans during congressional hearings who made false accusations that were clearly political propaganda to work up ignorant Republican voters.
|
|
|
Starfish, have you heard the latest from your Fuhrer?
THERE’S a loon that should be rounded up and be made to take his medication.
His “Peace on Earth” Christmas message was anything but.
|
|
|
Let Trump do Trump and fuck himself up all by himself !
Trump will not be the RNC candidate !
Thankfully the primary elections are coming for the Republican party, and that will be the telling
narrative for the remainder of 2024 for the RNC.
Eventually, both Trump and Biden will never see their names on the 2024 ballot.
Hopefully, Congress and the Senate legislate that a President cannot take office past 70 y.o. unless they have won a second term.
|
|
|
January 15th in Iowa
Feb. 6th - Nevada
Feb. 24th - South Carolina
Feb. 27th - Michigan
March 5th is California and about 25 other states, so March 5th is SUPER TUESDAY !
By the end of March, we will all know who the voters really want to take back the White House !
If it's Trump, I will be surprised, but like I have said, I don't think Trump would make the final ticket anyways, cuz by June his legal issues will just be too much baggage for the RNC to get him elected again.
|
|
|
You have to foresee the future here with China and Russia and Iran and North Korea ...
They're not going to let the status quo just remain the same !
Expect escalation in Ukraine / Russia / Eastern Europe
Expect something to start in the Southeast China Sea
Expect escalation in the Middle East --- Netanyahu has told Biden to pound sand, he's taking out all of Hamas and anyone else that threatens Israel.
Expect Kim Jong Un to start being Rocket Man again --- South Korea and Japan can only stand so much before they retaliate.
2024 will be unlike any other election year ever !
WW3 could become a reality !
Biden old and senile and inept ----> Couldn't debate anybody because he can't use his tele-prompter
Trump fucks himself ! ----> He always does ...
Who's going to be on the final ballot for the RNC and the DNC ?
Haley
vs
Newsom
Is what I foresee ...
|
|
|
January 15th in Iowa
Feb. 6th - Nevada
Feb. 24th - South Carolina
Feb. 27th - Michigan
You forgot New Hampshire on Jan 23.
|
|
|
Thanks CJ !
I was checking to see if anyone would notice 
|
|
|
Don't you people understand!?!?!
MA says it was insurrection and he's always right
No matter what
And, he will say it over and over and over and over until you plebs get it.
MA = Muellertard aka The Intellectual Dumpsterfire
|
|
|
MA1 is always right ----> I mean his proof sources are as far left as they can get, but in their minds they are correct ).gif)
Haley / Desantis 2024
|
|
|
Haley / Desantis 2024 !
|
| There are 50 comments on this blog. This blog is locked and no further comments are permitted. |
